Pages

Thursday, February 19, 2026

ThAct: R2020

  Revolution 2020 Novel by Chetan Bhagat


Revolution 2020 is a modern Indian novel that tells the interconnected story of three young individuals—Gopal, Raghav, and Aarti—whose lives unfold amid ambition, love, and the deep impact of corruption. Set in the culturally rich city of Varanasi, the narrative follows their personal and professional journeys as they struggle with emotional dilemmas and difficult moral decisions.

The novel highlights the conflict between personal ambition and societal pressures, showing how the intense pursuit of success can lead to ethical compromises. Through themes of love, power, and the longing for a better future, the story offers a critical commentary on India’s education system and the damaging effects of corruption on young aspirations. By portraying realistic characters and situations, Bhagat encourages readers to reflect on their own choices and to think about the possibility of genuine change in a society resistant to reform.

The Theme of Love


Tuesday, February 3, 2026

Lab Activity: R2020

Lab Activity: R2020

This blog task is assigned by Dr. Dilip Barad as a Lab Activity under R2020. For further details, click here.


Activity 1: Character Mapping (Remember → Understand)


Task Using the provided list of characters, generate a Character Map Infographic with any Gen AI tool that supports visual output.


Outcome: The infographic reveals a clear pattern in which power circulates through tightly connected institutions—education, media, and politics—while morality remains fragmented and unevenly distributed. Characters who occupy institutional centres, such as Gopal Mishra and MLA Shukla-ji, convert authority into personal gain, showing how systemic corruption is normalised rather than exceptional. Power here is collective and protected: regulators, party workers, and private owners form a self-sustaining network that resists accountability.

In contrast, moral idealism appears isolated. Raghav Kashyap’s ethical stance relies on personal courage rather than institutional support, making integrity vulnerable and costly. Aarti Pradhan embodies moral ambivalence, positioned between justice and privilege, illustrating how individual ethics are compromised by proximity to power.

The most striking pattern is the invisibility of the vulnerable class: their suffering sustains the system but grants them no influence. Overall, the map suggests that in Revolution 2020, morality functions as an individual burden, while power operates as an organised, deeply entrenched structure.

Activity 2: Cover Page Critique (Understand → Apply → Analyse)


Examine the cover page of Revolution Twenty20 and produce an AI-supported visual or textual analysis of it.

Infographic : 



Text : 

The cover of Revolution Twenty20 creates very clear expectations that closely correspond with popular, youth-focused fiction.

Revolution:
The term “Revolution” conveys ideas of radical transformation, rebellion, and idealism. However, its stylized formatting—boxed, fragmented, and combined with “Twenty20”—immediately signals a softened or altered version of revolution. Instead of suggesting a large-scale political uprising, the design prepares the reader for a personal or ethical conflict unfolding within a corrupt social system. The tagline “Love. Corruption. Ambition.” further shifts the meaning of revolution from a collective ideological movement to an internal and social struggle.

Youth:
The silhouette of a young figure looking toward the city represents aspiration, uncertainty, and transition—defining characteristics of youth. The presence of a romantic couple in the background emphasizes themes of longing and emotional tension, indicating that youthful ambitions are deeply connected to love and compromise. Overall, the imagery presents young protagonists who are torn between their ideals and the demands of survival.

Marketability:
The bold composition, strong color contrasts, and clean design make the book visually striking and easy to recognize. It clearly targets urban, English-speaking Indian youth by combining romance, ambition, and mild social commentary—a formula strongly associated with Chetan Bhagat’s popular appeal.

Typography, Color, and Symbolism:
The rough, distressed typography suggests instability and inner conflict. The pink-red hues symbolize both passion and corruption, while the urban skyline represents modern India’s dual nature—offering opportunity while also reflecting moral decay—features commonly found in contemporary commercial fiction.

Critical Reflection: Identifying Interpretive Gaps

After generating the AI-based analysis, we can identify at least two oversimplifications:

1. Overlooking the Cultural Significance of “Twenty20”
The analysis treats the combination of “Revolution” and “Twenty20” simply as an indication of a weakened or compromised revolution. However, this overlooks the strong cultural resonance of “Twenty20” within India. T20 cricket is fast-paced, highly commercialized, and media-driven. Labeling a revolution as “Twenty20” therefore suggests that resistance itself has been transformed into spectacle—quick, consumable, and market-friendly. This reflects the pragmatic survival strategies of characters like Gopal, whose ambitions are shaped more by opportunity and self-interest than by deep ideological conviction.

2. Ignoring the Visual Disruption of “LOVE” in the Title
While the analysis notes that the tagline internalizes revolution, it does not fully examine the graphic intervention within the title. The word “LOVE” appears inside a bright pink box that visually interrupts or replaces part of “REVOLUTION.” This design choice implies that romantic desire does not merely coexist with revolution—it actively disrupts or overrides it. In light of the character dynamics, particularly Aarti’s role as the emotional focal point, this suggests that the male protagonists’ so-called revolutionary impulses may be secondary to their personal competition for love. The revolution, therefore, becomes emotionally driven rather than politically grounded.


Activity 3: Infographic from Video Discourse (Analyse → Evaluate)

Task Using a Gen AI tool, generate an infographic based on the given video discussion on Popular Literature.

Video: 




Infographic:



How does the visual representation contrast “mass appeal” in popular literature with “intellectual capital” in high-brow literature?

1. Setting and Environment

Popular Literature:
The setting resembles an open marketplace with a stall labeled “Mass Appeal.” This suggests commercial accessibility and public consumption. The environment feels lively, open, and socially interactive.

High-Brow Literature:
The setting includes a grand academic building labeled “Intellectual Capital,” resembling a university or institutional space. This symbolizes prestige, scholarship, and long-term cultural value rather than immediate popularity.

2. Purpose and Primary Goal

Popular Literature:
It is shown as aiming for entertainment and commercial success. The imagery emphasizes enjoyment, quick engagement, and market-driven production.

High-Brow Literature:
It focuses on intellectual growth and philosophical depth. The visuals suggest reflection, artistic experimentation, and serious thought rather than profit alone.

3. Language and Style

Popular Literature:
The phrase “Crystal Clear Style” indicates simple, transparent language. It prioritizes easy understanding and fast consumption.

High-Brow Literature:
Phrases like “Symbolic Depth” and “Addressing the Abstract” highlight complexity, layered meanings, and challenging ideas that require careful interpretation.

4. Structure and Predictability

Popular Literature:
The section labeled “Formulaic” suggests predictable plots (love stories, mysteries, clear conflicts). The presence of stage-like scenes reinforces dramatic but straightforward storytelling.

High-Brow Literature:
The label “Experimental” indicates innovative forms and narrative experimentation. The winding path visually represents non-linear, complex storytelling.

5. Character Representation

Popular Literature:
The “Moral Clarity” sign shows clear heroes and villains, emphasizing simple moral divisions.

High-Brow Literature:
The “Human Complexity” section highlights ambiguous characters with “grey” motivations, suggesting psychological depth and moral uncertainty.

6. Reader Engagement

Popular Literature:
Readers are shown walking casually, engaging easily. The tone suggests instant gratification and emotional connection.

High-Brow Literature:
The imagery demands active intellectual engagement. Readers appear thoughtful and reflective, implying effort and deeper analysis.

7. Symbolism of the Journey

Popular Literature:
The path is straight and accessible, symbolizing direct enjoyment and clarity.

High-Brow Literature:
The path is winding and elevated, symbolizing intellectual challenge and sustained effort.

Extended Output:

The visual representation clearly establishes a structured contrast between popular literature and high-brow literature by using symbolic environments, character depictions, and thematic markers. Popular literature is associated with accessibility, entertainment, commercial success, and emotional clarity. It is presented as socially engaging, easy to understand, and designed for immediate satisfaction. The imagery suggests that its value lies in mass readership and instant connection.

In contrast, high-brow literature is portrayed as intellectually demanding, symbolically rich, and culturally prestigious. It emphasizes abstract thought, experimentation, and psychological complexity. The institutional setting reinforces the idea that its value is measured not by immediate sales but by long-term intellectual and cultural impact. The winding paths, layered symbolism, and reflective figures visually communicate that engaging with such literature requires patience, critical thinking, and interpretive effort.

Overall, the representation suggests that popular literature builds broad social reach and commercial popularity, while high-brow literature builds intellectual capital, critical awareness, and lasting cultural significance.

Activity 4: AI-Generated Slide Deck on Themes (Evaluate → Create)


The Joys of Motherhood by Buchi Emecheta

The Joys of Motherhood by Buchi Emecheta

This blog task has been assigned by Megha ma’am.


Q)  If Nnu Ego were living in 21st-century urban India or Africa, how would her understanding of motherhood, identity, and success change?


In The Joys of Motherhood, Buchi Emecheta presents Nnu Ego as a woman whose sense of self, honour, and achievement is completely centred on motherhood. For her, becoming a mother—especially to sons—is not a personal desire but a social duty and cultural expectation. However, if Nnu Ego were placed in the context of 21st-century urban India or Africa, her ideas about motherhood, identity, and success would change significantly, though they would still remain full of tension and struggle.

This blog discusses how modern urban life would transform Nnu Ego’s outlook, while also highlighting how many of her difficulties would continue in different forms.


Motherhood in the 21st Century: From Fate to Personal Choice


In the Novel

Within traditional Igbo society, motherhood is the foundation of a woman’s existence. Nnu Ego firmly believes that:

a woman’s value comes from bearing children,

sons ensure safety and respect in old age,

childlessness is a sign of disgrace and failure.

Motherhood is treated as unavoidable, sacred, and non-negotiable.

In 21st-Century Urban India or Africa

In modern urban environments, motherhood is increasingly seen as a choice rather than a fixed destiny.

Some changes Nnu Ego would encounter include:


access to education and reproductive knowledge,

awareness of family planning and smaller families,

limited but growing acceptance of delayed or child-free motherhood,

recognition of working and single mothers.

While Nnu Ego might still emotionally value motherhood, she would gradually realise that womanhood does not depend solely on becoming a mother.

However, this transformation would not be complete. Cultural expectations—especially among working-class women—still place motherhood on a pedestal. As a result, although her understanding would broaden, feelings of guilt and pressure to be an “ideal mother” would likely remain.

Identity: From a Single Role to a Divided Self


Nnu Ego’s Identity in the Novel

Nnu Ego does not possess an independent sense of self. Her identity is always defined through others:

as Agbadi’s daughter,

as Nnaife’s wife,

as the mother of Oshia and her other children.

She never questions who she is beyond these relationships. Her emotional breakdown begins when motherhood fails to bring the security and respect she expects.

Identity in a Modern Urban Setting


In 21st-century urban India or Africa, identity is more layered and complex. If Nnu Ego lived today, her identity would extend beyond motherhood.

She might see herself as:

a working woman (such as a vendor, domestic worker, or office employee),

a citizen with legal and social rights,

a mother alongside other roles,

an individual with personal goals and dreams.

Urban life encourages women to define themselves through education, employment, and personal achievement. Yet this freedom comes with conflict. Nnu Ego would likely struggle to manage:

workplace responsibilities,

emotional care work at home,

societal expectations of perfect motherhood.

Her identity would shift from a single definition (mother) to a constantly negotiated one (woman–worker–mother), offering empowerment but also exhaustion.

Redefining Success: From Bearing Sons to Self-Reliance

Success in Traditional Society

For Nnu Ego, success means:

having many children,

raising sons who will support her later in life,

being remembered as a devoted mother.

Ironically, she is praised only after her death, exposing how hollow this idea of success truly is.

Success in the 21st Century

In modern urban society, success is understood differently. It includes:

financial independence,

emotional and personal stability,

children’s education rather than just their number,

dignity and self-respect.

If Nnu Ego lived today:

she might view success as survival without losing herself completely,

she might invest in her own growth as well as her children’s,

she might expect emotional support instead of unquestioning sacrifice.

Yet modern capitalism creates new pressures. Women are expected to succeed at work, motherhood, and marriage—often without proper support. While success would no longer be limited to childbearing, the demand to “manage everything” could be equally oppressive.

Economic Independence: Freedom or Another Responsibility?

In the novel, Nnu Ego engages in small-scale trading, but her labour is:

poorly valued,

never-ending,

emotionally exhausting,

largely unappreciated.

In a 21st-century urban context:

she would have greater access to paid employment,

some legal protection,

limited but real economic control.

However, modern economic systems often exploit women under the promise of empowerment. Nnu Ego might still:

work long hours,

earn less than male counterparts,

carry the burden of unpaid domestic work.

Economic independence would provide some freedom, but it would not fully release her from inequality.

Emotional Awareness and Feminist Consciousness

One of the most important changes would be Nnu Ego’s awareness of her own oppression.

In the novel, her feminist realisation comes late and in isolation. In a contemporary setting, she might encounter:

feminist ideas through education or media,

stories of other women’s struggles,

discussions on women’s rights through social media,

NGOs and community support systems.

She might begin questioning earlier:

Why must motherhood demand complete self-denial?

Why is my value measured only through others?

This awareness would not erase her suffering, but it would give her the language to understand and express it—something she lacks in the novel.

What Would Still Remain Unchanged?

Despite progress, many of Nnu Ego’s struggles would continue:


moral judgement of mothers,

criticism of women labelled “selfish” or “failed,”

unequal care responsibilities,

emotional invisibility of maternal labour.

Patriarchy has not vanished; it has merely changed its appearance. What was once enforced openly is now often hidden under ideas of “choice” and “love.”

Conclusion: A Different Era, the Same Emotional Cost

If Nnu Ego lived in 21st-century urban India or Africa, her understanding of motherhood, identity, and success would be wider, more complex, and more self-aware. Motherhood would no longer define her entire existence; identity would extend beyond family roles; success would include independence and dignity.

Yet the central tragedy of Nnu Ego—that women are expected to give endlessly without recognition—would still remain relevant. While the structure of oppression may change, the emotional burden of idealised motherhood continues.

Nnu Ego, therefore, is not just a character of the past. She stands as a powerful reminder that until women are valued as complete individuals, motherhood—whether traditional or modern—will remain both fulfilling and deeply demanding.


Q)  Buchi Emecheta presents motherhood as both fulfilment and burden. Do you think the novel ultimately celebrates motherhood or questions it?


Buchi Emecheta’s The Joys of Motherhood presents Nnu Ego as a woman whose entire sense of self-worth, dignity, and achievement is deeply rooted in her role as a mother. For her, motherhood—especially bearing sons—is not simply a personal experience but a social duty and cultural destiny. Yet, if Nnu Ego were placed in the context of 21st-century urban India or Africa, her ideas of motherhood, identity, and success would be reshaped in significant ways, even though many of her struggles would still persist in altered forms.

This blog examines how modern urban realities might transform Nnu Ego’s worldview, while also revealing the continuities of patriarchal pressure that continue to define women’s lives today.

Motherhood in the 21st Century: From Obligation to Choice

Motherhood in the Novel

Within traditional Igbo society, motherhood is the central measure of a woman’s value. Nnu Ego firmly believes that:

a woman’s worth lies in her ability to bear children,

sons ensure security in old age, and

infertility is a source of shame and failure.

Motherhood is therefore mandatory rather than optional, unquestioned and idealized as a sacred duty.

Motherhood in a Contemporary Urban Setting

In present-day urban India or Africa, motherhood is increasingly understood as a choice rather than an inevitable destiny. If Nnu Ego lived today, she would encounter:

greater access to education and reproductive knowledge,

awareness of family planning and smaller households,

partial social acceptance of delayed or child-free motherhood, and

growing visibility of working and single mothers.

Although Nnu Ego might continue to value motherhood emotionally, she could begin to recognise that womanhood does not have to be defined solely by motherhood. However, this transformation would be incomplete. Cultural expectations—especially for working-class women—still glorify maternal sacrifice, leaving space for lingering guilt, anxiety, and pressure to conform to ideals of “perfect motherhood.”

Identity: From Singular Role to Negotiated Self

Identity in the Novel

Nnu Ego’s identity is entirely relational. She exists only as:

Agbadi’s daughter,

Nnaife’s wife, and

the mother of her children.

She never considers herself as an independent individual. Her emotional breakdown begins when motherhood fails to provide the recognition and security she was promised.

Identity in the Modern Urban World

In a contemporary urban society, identity is more layered and complex. Nnu Ego’s sense of self would not be confined to one role. She might see herself as:

a wage-earning woman,

a citizen with rights,

a mother among several identities, and

an individual with personal hopes and ambitions.

Modern urban life encourages women to define themselves through education, employment, and personal achievement. Yet, this expanded identity often brings conflict. Nnu Ego would likely struggle to balance:

professional responsibilities,

emotional caregiving, and

social expectations of ideal motherhood.

Thus, her identity would shift from being exclusively maternal to constantly negotiated, offering empowerment but also deep exhaustion.

Redefining Success: Beyond Motherhood Alone

Traditional Definitions of Success

For Nnu Ego, success means:

having many children,

raising sons who will support her, and

earning social respect as a devoted mother.

Tragically, this recognition comes only after her death, exposing the hollowness of this definition.

Success in the 21st Century

In modern urban contexts, success is measured differently. It includes:

financial independence,

personal stability,

children’s education and well-being, and

dignity and self-respect.

If Nnu Ego lived today, she might define success as:

surviving economically without erasing herself,

investing in her own growth alongside her children’s, and

expecting emotional reciprocity rather than unquestioned sacrifice.

However, modern capitalism complicates these ideals. Women are now expected to excel at work, caregiving, and domestic life simultaneously, often without adequate support. As a result, success may no longer be limited to motherhood, but the demand to “manage everything” can be equally oppressive.

Economic Independence: Freedom with Limits

In the novel, Nnu Ego engages in small-scale trading, but her labour remains:

undervalued,

exhausting, and

taken for granted.

In a contemporary urban setting, she might have:

better access to paid employment,

limited legal protections, and

some degree of economic agency.

Yet, modern systems often exploit women’s labour in the name of empowerment. Nnu Ego would still likely:

work long hours,

earn less than men, and

shoulder unpaid domestic responsibilities.

Economic independence would therefore provide partial liberation, not complete freedom.

Feminist Awareness and Emotional Recognition

One of the most significant changes would be Nnu Ego’s access to awareness and language. In the novel, her feminist consciousness emerges late and in isolation. In a modern context, she might encounter:

feminist ideas,

shared narratives of women’s struggle,

social media discussions on gender inequality, and

NGOs or support networks.

She might begin questioning earlier:

Why must motherhood demand total self-sacrifice?

Why is my worth defined only through others?

This awareness would not erase her suffering, but it would allow her to articulate her pain, something denied to her in the novel.

What Would Still Remain Unchanged?

Despite social progress, many of Nnu Ego’s struggles would persist:

moral policing of mothers,

judgment of women who do not conform,

unequal division of care work, and

emotional invisibility of maternal labour.

Patriarchy has not disappeared; it has simply taken new forms. What was once enforced openly is now often disguised as “choice” or “love.”

Conclusion: A New World, an Old Struggle

If Nnu Ego lived in 21st-century urban India or Africa, her understanding of motherhood, identity, and success would be broader, more complex, and more self-aware. Motherhood would no longer be her sole purpose; identity would extend beyond family roles; success would include independence and self-respect.

Yet, the core tragedy of her life—that women are taught to give endlessly without recognition—would remain relevant. The structure of oppression would change, but the emotional cost of idealized motherhood would persist.

Emecheta’s Nnu Ego is therefore not a figure confined to the past. She reminds us that until women are valued as complete human beings, motherhood—whether traditional or modern—will continue to exist as both a joy and a burden.

Question: Does The Joys of Motherhood Celebrate or Question Motherhood?

Reconsidering Motherhood in Buchi Emecheta’s Narrative

At first glance, The Joys of Motherhood seems to affirm the belief that motherhood represents the highest fulfilment of a woman’s life. The title itself evokes pride and emotional reward. However, as the narrative unfolds, this promise is steadily undermined. Through Nnu Ego’s life, Emecheta presents motherhood as deeply contradictory—emotionally meaningful yet socially exploitative.

This analysis argues that the novel ultimately questions rather than celebrates motherhood, revealing it as an institution shaped by patriarchy, colonialism, and economic hardship rather than an inherently fulfilling experience.

Motherhood as Cultural Fulfilment

In traditional Igbo society, motherhood forms the foundation of female identity. A woman’s value depends on:

her fertility,

the number of children she bears, and

especially her ability to produce sons.

For Nnu Ego, motherhood promises recognition, belonging, and security. The birth of sons initially brings pride and validation. Suffering appears acceptable if it leads to social respect. In this sense, motherhood offers symbolic fulfilment.

From Fulfilment to Burden

As the story progresses, motherhood becomes unceasing labour. Nnu Ego’s life is marked by exhaustion, poverty, and isolation. With little support from her husband, motherhood turns into a one-sided obligation that demands everything and guarantees nothing in return.

The emotional cost is equally severe. Nnu Ego begins to question why women must give endlessly without recognition. Motherhood erases her individuality, leaving her with no identity beyond service. This psychological awakening signals Emecheta’s critique of motherhood as a burden imposed by society.

The Irony of the Title

The novel’s title functions as a powerful irony. Instead of joy, motherhood brings hardship, neglect, and loneliness. Nnu Ego is honoured only after her death, when recognition is meaningless. Emecheta exposes how societies glorify motherhood in words while denying mothers real support.

Motherhood as a Social Institution

Emecheta does not reject motherhood itself; rather, she critiques it as an institution governed by patriarchy and economic inequality. Nnu Ego does not choose motherhood freely—she is conditioned into it. By presenting motherhood as compulsory, the novel challenges the belief that maternal sacrifice is natural or noble.

Colonialism and Economic Pressure

Urban colonial life intensifies the burden of motherhood. Traditional support systems collapse, and capitalist demands isolate women further. Nnu Ego’s struggle becomes solitary, highlighting how colonial and economic structures exploit women’s labour.

Feminist Questioning

When Nnu Ego asks when a woman can be fulfilled in herself rather than through others, Emecheta’s feminist intervention becomes clear. The novel gives voice to maternal frustration without condemning women themselves, turning motherhood into a site of critical reflection.

Conclusion

Ultimately, The Joys of Motherhood does not celebrate motherhood in a conventional sense. Instead, it questions the systems that define motherhood as a woman’s ultimate purpose while denying her dignity and autonomy.

By exposing the gap between the promise of joy and the reality of suffering, Emecheta urges readers to rethink how motherhood is idealized and who truly benefits from maternal sacrifice. The novel’s lasting power lies in its central question:

If motherhood offers neither security nor fulfilment, why must it define a woman’s worth?

Sunday, January 18, 2026

The Ministry of Utmost Happiness | Flipped Learning Task

 The Ministry of Utmost Happiness 


This blog post is created as a component of a flipped learning exercise focused on Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. For this activity, we are required to watch videos connected to the novel and provide a summary of the content for each video. [Click Here]




The video explores the introduction of Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness and provides an overview of its characters and their relationships. The novel can be difficult to follow initially, even after multiple readings, due to its complex narrative structure and elements of magical realism.

The story spans five primary locations: Khwabgah, Jannat Guest House, Jantar Mantar, Kashmir, and Dandakaranya, and centers on Anjum, a hijra living in the Jannat Graveyard.

In the second chapter, Khwabgah, Anjum meets a blind Imam named Ziauddin, and the narrative then delves into Anjum’s past. Born to Mulaqat Ali and Jahanara Begum, Anjum was revealed by the midwife, Ahlam Baiji, to be intersex, possessing both male and female genitalia. Initially named Aftab, Anjum’s parents struggled to accept their child’s identity as a hijra.

Aftab eventually discovers Khwabgah while out shopping with his mother, a space where he encounters others like him, including Mary, Gudiya, Bulbul, Bismillah, Raziya, and Nimmu Gorakhpuri, under the guidance of matriarch Begum Kulsoom Bi. Over time, Aftab’s parents slowly come to accept their child’s third-gender identity, even visiting Hazrat Sarmad’s Dargah for blessings, though this yields no tangible change. The novel also recounts the story of Sarmad, who was executed at Jama Masjid for reciting an incomplete Kalima while in love with a man named Abhaychand.

Later, Aftab witnesses this execution and discovers an abandoned baby, Zainab, on the steps of Jama Masjid. He brings her to Khwabgah, but when she falls ill, he blames Saeeda, another hijra, whom he considers an adversary. Hoping for Zainab’s recovery, Aftab visits the Ajmer Sharif Dargah with Zakir Mian. Zakir then suggests a trip to Ahmedabad to settle some family matters.

This journey introduces the Gujarat Riots of 2002, a turning point in the novel. During the riots, Zakir is killed by a mob, while Aftab is spared, as it is believed that harming a hijra brings misfortune. The violence profoundly affects Aftab, prompting him to change both his and Zainab’s identities. Fully embracing the name and identity of Anjum, he begins an independent life at the Jannat Guest House.




The video introduces a character named Saddam Hussain, who moves into the Jannat Guest House. He works at a local hospital and previously served as a security guard. His real name is Dayachand, and he comes from the Chamar caste in Haryana—a community historically associated with leatherworking and considered socially low in the caste hierarchy. Dayachand’s father, a leatherworker, was brutally lynched by an inspector named Sehravat, who accused him of killing a “holy cow,” even though the animal was already dead. Seeking revenge, Dayachand renames himself Saddam Hussain, inspired by the execution of the former Iraqi leader, and vows to avenge his father by killing Sehravat.

The story then shifts to Jantar Mantar in New Delhi, a prominent site for protests. Here, Anjum observes various groups demonstrating, including the Tubby Old Gandhian (representing Anna Hazare), Mr. Aggarwal (symbolizing Kejriwal), the Mothers of the Disappeared, Manipur nationalists, Delhi Kabadiwala, and Dr. Azad Bhartiya. Jantar Mantar serves as a platform for expressing grievances against the government, with Dr. Azad Bhartiya acting as a central figure connecting these movements. While there, Anjum notices a baby, which suddenly disappears just as quickly as it appeared.




As the lecture continues, we gain insight into the novel’s deeper themes and the connections between its characters. The narrative shifts between third-person and first-person perspectives, with Piglet, a landlord, narrating part of his own story. This section introduces key characters like Tilo, whose life is intertwined with others, and Musa, who becomes involved in terrorism. The story addresses major issues such as terrorism in Kashmir, the impact of violence, and the personal struggles of the characters, illustrating how tragedies often push people into cycles of revenge and conflict.

Towards the end, a letter highlights the close interconnections among all the characters. Each one represents a unique aspect of the human experience, showing how individual lives are shaped by broader social forces. For instance, Musa’s turn to terrorism is depicted not merely as a moral failing but as a consequence of the violence and loss he has endured, encouraging readers to understand his actions in a more nuanced way.

The narrative also explores the Kashmir conflict, portraying both victims and perpetrators of violence in a humanized manner. It demonstrates how violence perpetuates further violence and how individuals striving for peace or justice can become trapped in cycles of revenge. Overall, the story emphasizes how society shapes people’s choices and highlights the enduring psychological and social effects of violence on everyone involved.



The final chapter, Guih Kyom (meaning “a dung beetle”), marks a significant point in the story. It shows that Tilo has begun teaching children at the guest house, while the graves of other characters, including Ahlam Bazi, are also highlighted. In one moment, Ahlam shifts her sleeping position as the conversation among the characters continues. The chapter features a striking line: “How to tell a shattered story, by slowly becoming everybody, no, by slowly becoming everything,” emphasizing the narrative’s complexity.

Tragedy occurs when it is revealed that Musa has died in an encounter. One night, unable to sleep, Anjum takes Udaya Jebeen for a walk through the city. During the walk, Udaya pauses to relieve herself, and Anjum waits by her side. On their return, they notice a dung beetle lying on its back, staring at the sky as if it could save the world. This image serves as a symbol of hope and resilience. The novel ends on a note of optimism, suggesting that with Udaya Jebeen’s arrival, things may improve, and time will bring change.




The Nature of Paradise:
The Jannat Guest House represents a reimagined concept of paradise, challenging the traditional notion that heaven exists only in the afterlife. It suggests that a form of paradise can be created on earth through empathy, understanding, and peaceful coexistence among diverse communities.

Ambiguity and Diversity:
The novel highlights India’s immense cultural and social diversity and the tensions that arise from it. Everyday situations—like vegetarians dining with non-vegetarians—symbolize these differences. Religious traditions, such as Hindus offering prashad, Christians sharing wine, and Muslims sharing meat, reflect distinct cultural values while illustrating the possibility of coexisting identities.

The Cost of Modernization:
Development often carries significant consequences. Projects like urban modernization and infrastructure expansion frequently displace marginalized communities, including farmers and slum dwellers. The novel critiques such one-sided progress and calls for development that is equitable and benefits everyone rather than increasing social inequality.

Blurring Life and Death:
The boundaries between life and death are portrayed as fluid. Characters like Musa and Revathy continue to exist in memories and hearts, even after death. The practice of reburial, moving graves from one place to another, further illustrates this blending. The Jannat Guest House, named after paradise, becomes a space for the living, challenging conventional ideas about mortality.

Storytelling and Its Purpose:
Roy explores the complexity of storytelling through the line, “How to tell a shattered story? By slowly becoming everybody, no, by slowly becoming everything.” Multiple narratives—transgender struggles, the Kashmir conflict, Maoist resistance—are woven together to reflect the fractured reality of India. Storytelling becomes a cathartic, almost life-giving process, necessary to reveal truth despite its difficulty.

Social Status in Contemporary India:
The novel provides a panoramic view of modern India, addressing the lives of Hijras, urban transformation, and the Kashmir conflict. Although seemingly unrelated, these themes are connected through Roy’s critique of capitalism and her focus on marginalized communities.

Corruption, Political Violence, and Exploitation:
The novel examines socio-political issues in India, especially the Kashmir conflict, critiquing actors like the Indian Army, Kashmiri militants, and leftist activists for exploiting situations for personal or financial gain. Even under the guise of moral or religious justification, these actions harm innocent people.

Resilience and Hope:
Despite the hardships depicted, the novel emphasizes hope and resilience. Characters endure immense suffering but draw strength from relationships and beliefs. In Kashmir, people risk their lives to bury the dead, demonstrating perseverance. Udaya Jebeen, a child symbolizing new beginnings, embodies hope for a better future, suggesting that positive change is possible through resilience.

Gender Identity and Societal Divisions:
Anjum’s journey as a transgender woman highlights the discrimination Hijras face in India. Her resilience and unique identity challenge societal norms surrounding gender and belonging. Her survival during a massacre, based on superstitions about harming Hijras, underscores her strength. Through Anjum, Roy questions rigid gender roles while also addressing broader societal divides, including religion and nationality.

Social Hierarchy and Inclusivity:
India’s caste and religious hierarchies often lead to isolation and violence, as seen in Biplab, an intelligence officer disconnected despite his privilege. In contrast, Anjum’s inclusive approach at the Jannat Guest House fosters belonging and hope for marginalized people. Her actions show that kindness and inclusivity can bridge societal divides and promote harmony.

Religion and Power:
The novel critiques the dangerous intersection of religion and politics. It shows how Hindu-Muslim tensions, fueled by extremist figures like “Gujarat ka Lalla,” create division and violence. Islamic extremism in Kashmir also leads to internal conflict and narrow views of freedom. Roy warns that mixing religion and politics threatens individual freedoms, societal unity, and peace, urging readers to recognize the damage caused by such extremism.



Hazrat Sarmad Shaheed:
Originally from Armenia, Hazrat Sarmad Shaheed was a deeply spiritual figure who traveled to India, embraced Islam, and formed a close bond with a Hindu man named Abhaychand. He was executed due to his questioning of religious orthodoxy, yet his story endures as a symbol of love that transcends religion and identity. His shrine embodies inclusivity, welcoming people from all walks of life, and his life underscores how love and spirituality can overcome rigid societal norms.

The Old Man-Baby:
This elderly figure gained recognition for his hunger strike protests against corruption in India. He became a symbol of hope for marginalized communities, particularly those displaced from their homes. Over time, however, wealthier groups and political agendas co-opted his movement, shifting it away from its original purpose. Despite his vulnerability, his actions represented the potential for a better future for overlooked populations.

The Shiraz Cinema:
Shiraz Cinema symbolizes India’s cultural outreach, particularly in Kashmir. It was later shut down by Muslim separatists who saw it as a tool of cultural dominance. Subsequently, the Indian Army repurposed it as a detention center where people were tortured, highlighting how unresolved social tensions can escalate into violence and oppression.

Jannat Guest House and Funeral Parlor:
The Jannat Guest House serves as a sanctuary for those marginalized due to religion, class, or identity, embodying inclusivity and the potential of an accepting India. Located near spaces of death, it represents both fragility and hope, bridging the real world with a vision of paradise.

Duniya and Jannat:
“Duniya” (the world) and “Jannat” (paradise) are contrasting symbols in the novel. While the world reflects struggle and harshness, paradise signifies peace and harmony. The narrative, however, complicates these ideas, showing that even paradise can hide danger or violence.

Motherhood:
Motherhood recurs as a theme, seen through characters like Anjum, who aspires to become a mother but faces societal barriers. The novel also ties motherhood to the idea of “Mother India,” though characters from other religious backgrounds find it difficult to relate. Motherhood is redefined as an act of empathy and inclusiveness that transcends religion and culture.

Bodies, Waste, and Inner Struggles:
The novel uses imagery of bodies and waste to highlight systemic and social inequalities. Dalits, who handle cleaning and dead bodies, symbolize marginalized communities burdened with societal injustice. The body also serves as a metaphor for resistance against oppression, reflecting the inner conflicts and traumas of the characters.

Guih Kyom, the Dung Beetle:
The dung beetle in the final chapter symbolizes resilience and hope. Though small, it plays an essential role in maintaining environmental balance, illustrating how even seemingly minor actions can have a meaningful impact. The beetle serves as a reminder that hope and change can emerge from unexpected sources.

Gujarat ka Lalla:
“Gujarat ka Lalla” represents a political figure inspired by Narendra Modi, symbolizing the rise of Hindu nationalism in India. His connection to the 2002 Gujarat riots highlights the dangers of extremist ideologies, which exacerbate divisions and marginalize vulnerable groups.

The Color Saffron:
Saffron in the novel symbolizes Hindu extremism, associated with nationalist followers and the violence inflicted on minorities. Anjum’s survival of a massacre demonstrates the trauma caused by such violence, with saffron representing the oppressive nature of extremist ideologies.

The Vulture:
Vultures symbolize the impact of modernization on both society and the environment. Their decline, caused by chemical use in farming, also represents those who challenge dominant systems but are silenced. The disappearance of vultures mirrors the loss of voices that question societal harm.


Worksheet : 

Activity A: The “Shattered Story” Structure

Shattered Storytelling in The Ministry of Utmost Happiness: Trauma and Non-linear Narrative

Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness employs a deliberately fragmented and non-chronological narrative, reflecting the shattered psyches of its characters. Prof. Dilip Barad notes that Roy tells stories in a “fragmented and non-chronological way” because the characters themselves are fragmented by personal and historical traumas. This method allows the novel to “slowly become everything,” merging multiple perspectives, locations, and timelines into a single, interconnected web that mirrors the fractured reality of postcolonial India.

The novel moves fluidly between spaces like the Khwabgah in Old Delhi, a haven for marginalized individuals, and the Graveyard (Jannat), where Anjum builds a home for those society discards. This spatial shift parallels the narrative fragmentation: just as the characters navigate multiple social and emotional terrains, the reader moves through a disjointed timeline that reflects the characters’ internal and external disruptions. For instance, Anjum’s experiences are interwoven with Tilo’s story in Kashmir, creating a narrative echo across time and space. The connection is literalized when Anjum finds the baby left by Tilo, demonstrating how the characters’ lives intersect in ways that defy linear causality.

Roy’s non-linear approach also mirrors the trauma of the characters. By presenting events out of order, the narrative replicates the way trauma disrupts memory: past and present co-exist in a jarring simultaneity. The reader experiences Tilo’s Kashmir backstory alongside Anjum’s life in Delhi and the Graveyard, highlighting the lingering effects of political violence and social marginalization. The temporal shifts force readers to reconstruct events, just as the characters themselves must piece together their identities amid loss, displacement, and societal neglect.

The concept of “telling a shattered story by slowly becoming everything” is embodied in the narrative’s interweaving of diverse voices and locations. Each fragment—whether it is a flashback to Tilo’s trauma in Kashmir or a vignette of Anjum’s care for the foundling—serves as a microcosm of the broader social and political fractures in India. The novel resists a single, authoritative perspective, instead embracing multiplicity, which emphasizes that understanding trauma requires inhabiting multiple viewpoints and spaces simultaneously.

In conclusion, the non-linear timeline and spatial shifts in The Ministry of Utmost Happiness are not mere stylistic choices but essential strategies to embody the characters’ trauma. By shattering chronology and perspective, Roy compels the reader to engage with the fragmented realities of her characters, while the interconnections—such as the linkage between Tilo’s tragedy and Anjum’s adoption of the baby—demonstrate how personal and collective histories are inseparably intertwined.

Activity B: Mapping the Conflict





Activity C: Automated Timeline & Character Arcs (Auto-mode with Comet)

Automated Timeline of Events

Anjum's Journey

Birth as Aftab - Anjum is born into a family in Gujarat, where she experiences early life marked by community expectations and cultural norms.

Life in Khwabgah - Following the trauma faced during the Gujarat Riots in 2002, Anjum finds refuge in Khwabgah, a space for marginalized individuals. Here, she grapples with her identity and the impact of violence on her community.

Trauma in Gujarat (2002) - The Gujarat Riots cause significant upheaval in Anjum's life. She witnesses communal violence that shapes her perspective and drives her to seek justice and understanding of her identity.

Moving to the Graveyard - After her traumatic experiences and the loss of her community, Anjum relocates to a graveyard, which symbolizes her search for solace and acceptance. The graveyard becomes a metaphor for the lives lost during the riots and her own transformation.

Saddam Hussain's Journey

Witnessing Father's Lynching - As a child, Saddam witnesses the brutal lynching of his father due to cow protection violence, a horrific event that deeply traumatizes him and influences his views on oppression and violence in society.

Changing His Name to Saddam - In a powerful act of defiance against the oppressive circumstances surrounding him, Saddam adopts the name Saddam Hussain. This name change symbolizes his rejection of his past identity and his stance against perceived American imperialism and local oppression.

Meeting Anjum - Saddam encounters Anjum at a pivotal moment in their lives. Their meeting is marked by shared experiences of trauma and loss, fostering a deep connection that explores themes of identity, resistance, and the search for belonging.

Verification of Timeline

Timeline Consistency: Review the video transcripts for mentions of the key events and character motivations, focusing on context surrounding Anjum's trauma and Saddam's name change, ensuring they align with the established narrative.

Motivations Behind Events: Emphasize how Anjum's experiences during the Gujarat Riots directly impact her identity and choices. Similarly, focus on how Saddam’s choice of name serves as both an act of defiance and a reaction to the violence he has witnessed.

Final Adjustments: Make any necessary updates to the timeline based on the verification process, ensuring all details regarding motivations and events align accurately with the content of the original lectures and transcripts.

Activity D: The "Audio/Video" Synthesis




References : 


DoE-MKBU. (2021a, December 28). Part 1 | Khwabgah | The Ministry of Utmost Happiness | Arundhati Roy [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-29vE53apGs 

DoE-MKBU. (2021b, December 28). Part 2 | Jantar Mantar | The Ministry of Utmost Happiness | Arundhati Roy [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr1z1AEXPBU

DoE-MKBU. (2021c, December 28). Part 3 | Kashmir and Dandakaranyak | The Ministry of Utmost Happiness | Arundhati Roy [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIKH_89rML0

DoE-MKBU. (2021d, December 28). Part 4 | Udaya Jebeen & Dung Beetle | The Ministry of Utmost Happiness | Arundhati Roy [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VH5EULOFP4g

DoE-MKBU. (2021e, December 30). Symbols and Motifs | The Ministry of Utmost Happiness | Arundhati Roy [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbBOqLB487U

DoE-MKBU. (2021f, December 30). Thematic Study | The Ministry of Utmost Happiness | Arundhati Roy [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NYSTUTBoSs 

Lab Activity: Gun Island

Lab Activity: Gun Island

This blog is prepared for a Lab Activity on Gun Island assigned by Dr. Dilip Barad. The purpose of the task is to critically examine Amitav Ghosh’s novel, focusing on its themes, narrative strategies, and cultural relevance. Click Here.

Research Activity

Mythification of history and historicisation

Prompt 1: Create a table showing each source with its publication dates,author credentials,and whether its primary source, secondary analysis or opinion piece.


Source Title

Publication Date(s)

Author Credentials

Source Type

"Gun Island" and "The Great Derangement" by Amitav Ghosh: Summary & Analysis

Circa 2021–2024

Forrest Brown: Climate writer and creator of Stories for Earth; work featured in Facing South and The Long Now Foundation.

Secondary Analysis (Summary and literary analysis)

Legends of Loss: Climate, Myth, and Displacement in Amitav Ghosh’s Gun Island

September 2025

Dr. Santosh Kumar: Assistant Professor of English at Dr. Ambedkar Govt. Post Graduate College.

Secondary Analysis (Peer-reviewed academic journal)

Dilip Barad | Teacher Blog

December 2021 – March 2022

Prof. Dilip Barad: Professor and Head of the Department of English at Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University.

Secondary Analysis (Educational summaries and study guides)

Gun Island | Thematic Study | PPTX

Not explicitly dated (refers to 2019 novel)

Prof. Dilip Barad: Academic and researcher at Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University.

Secondary Analysis (Thematic presentation)

Myth as Epistemology and Historical Memory in Amitav Ghosh’s Gun Island

August 5, 2025

Mrs. D.G. Kalaivani & Dr. P. Selvi: Scholars at Vellalar College for Women, Erode, India.

Secondary Analysis (Comparative literary research article)

Part I - Historification of Myth... (YouTube Transcript)

Circa 2022 (based on linked blog activities)

Department of English (DoE-MKBU): Faculty and students at Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University.

Secondary Analysis (Academic lecture/discussion transcript)

Postcolonial Nonhuman Blurring (B)orders in Migrant Ecologies

2022

Ashwarya Samkaria: Independent researcher.

Secondary Analysis (Peer-reviewed research article in Ecozon@)

Reclaiming the Sacred: The Mythic Imagination in Amitav Ghosh’s Gun Island

October 2025

C. Mobisha Keni (MA Student) & A. Annie Divya Mahisha (Assistant Professor): Affiliated with Holy Cross College and Manonmaniam Sundaranar University.

Secondary Analysis (Research article in the International Journal of Advanced Research)



Prompt 2: Which of these sources are more frequently cited or referenced by other sources in this notebook ?


Based on the sources provided in this notebook, the most frequently cross-referenced materials are those associated with Prof. Dilip Barad and the Department of English at Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University (MKBU).

While the other academic articles are independent studies that rarely cite one another, the Barad/MKBU sources function as a connected educational network.

The MKBU / Dilip Barad Citation Network

The following sources are interlinked through direct mentions, links, and shared curriculum:

  • Dilip Barad’s Teacher Blog [Source 3]: This source acts as a central hub for the other MKBU materials. It explicitly directs readers to the Thematic Study PPTX [Source 4] and the YouTube Lecture Series [Source 6] for further study.

  • Gun Island Thematic Study PPTX [Source 4]: This presentation specifically recommends "Related Content" produced by the Department of English MKBU, which is the same entity responsible for the YouTube transcript [Source 6].

  • YouTube Lecture Transcript [Source 6]: The speaker in this transcript references "our thematic study of this novel," which aligns with the structure and titles found in Barad’s blog and PPTX.

Subject vs. Source Citations

It is important to distinguish between the subject of the notebook and the sources within it:

  • Amitav Ghosh: Every single source in this notebook cites or references Amitav Ghosh’s books, specifically Gun Island and The Great Derangement. However, because Ghosh’s original texts are not included as source documents in this notebook, they are considered external references rather than cross-referenced notebook sources.

  • Independent Academic Sources: The research papers by Dr. Santosh Kumar [Source 2], Kalaivani & Selvi [Source 5], Ashwarya Samkaria [Source 7], and Keni & Mahisha [Source 8] are independent analyses. They do not cite the other blog posts or transcripts found in this notebook, preferring instead to reference established scholars like Stacy Alaimo, Dipesh Chakrabarty, and Joseph Campbell.

Summary of Frequent Internal References

Source EntityInternal References Found In...
Prof. Dilip Barad / MKBUBarad’s Blog, MKBU YouTube Transcript, Slideshare PPTX
Thematic Study MaterialsDirectly cross-linked between Source 3, Source 4, and Source 6


Prompt 3: Summarize the primary perspective of the top five most substantial sources

The five most substantial sources in this collection offer complementary analyses of Amitav Ghosh’s work, primarily focusing on how myth, history, and the climate crisis intersect to challenge modern Western rationalism.

1. Forrest Brown: The Role of Storytelling

Forrest Brown’s perspective centers on how stories act as vital tools for imagining a future in the face of the climate emergency.

  • Response to Realism: He views Gun Island as a direct response to the "Great Derangement," a term for the failure of modern realist literature to address the "wild, unthinkable" realities of climate change.

  • Deliverance through the Past: Brown argues that Ghosh suggests our "deliverance lies not in the future but in the past," specifically in ancient stories that were written when humans lived in closer connection to the Earth.

  • Colonial Roots: He emphasizes that the current refugee crisis is a direct consequence of centuries of European colonial exploitation of natural resources.

2. Dr. Santosh Kumar: Myth as a Narrative Framework

Dr. Kumar frames the novel as a "critical intervention in Anthropocene literature" that uses myth to make planetary-scale crises intelligible.

  • Reactivation of Legend: He argues that Ghosh "reactivates" Bengali folk legends not as mere metaphors but as active narrative frameworks to interpret freak weather and mass migrations.

  • The Refugee/Wanderer Link: A primary focus is the connection between the mythological exile of the "wanderer" and the contemporary plight of the "refugee," portraying climate displacement as a deep historical pattern.

  • Interspecies Kinship: Kumar highlights the "de-centering" of human protagonists, giving narrative weight to "more-than-human" actors like swarming spiders and dolphins.

3. Prof. Dilip Barad: Historification and Etymology

Prof. Barad’s perspective is pedagogical, focusing on the specific literary techniques Ghosh uses to blend reality and folklore.

  • Historification of Myth: He defines this as setting actions in the past to draw parallels with contemporary events, enabling a "thinking response" from the reader.

  • Etymological Mystery: Barad places heavy emphasis on Ghosh’s use of language, noting that words—like sailors—are travelers that point to the "intermeshing of cultures" over ages.

  • Genre Study: He positions the work firmly within "Cli-fi" (Climate Fiction), a genre meant to "wake people up" through the power of urgent storytelling.

4. Kalaivani & Selvi: Myth as an Epistemological Tool

These scholars view myth as a "trans-historical archive" and a vital mode of knowledge for understanding ecological crises.

  • Departure from Modernism: They distinguish Ghosh from modernists like T.S. Eliot or James Joyce; while modernists used myth to critique cultural decay, Ghosh uses it for "ethical urgency" and "planetary survival".

  • Deconstructing Rationalism: Their perspective validates myth as a "lived, phenomenological reality" that captures what linear history cannot, such as diasporic trauma and nonhuman interrelations.

  • A Survival Manual: Ultimately, they argue the Gun Merchant’s tale serves as a "survival manual" for marginalized communities facing "slow violence".

5. Ashwarya Samkaria: Post-Anthropocentric Relationality

Samkaria offers a "post-anthropocentric" reading, focusing on how the novel blurs the borders between the human and nonhuman worlds.

  • Trans-corporeality: The primary perspective here is that human bodies are "ultimately inseparable from the environment," creating a state of "inescapable interconnectedness" with all matter.

  • Nonhuman Agency: Samkaria studies how Ghosh recognizes the "agentic capacities" of the nonhuman, presenting animals and ecosystems not as background objects but as storied subjects with their own voices.

  • Challenging Dualism: The source argues that the myth of Manasa Devi serves to dismantle the "nature-culture dualism" promoted by Western modernity.


Prompt 4: Identify ‘Research Gap’ for further research in this area.

Application of Indian Poetics (Rasa Theory)

While Prof. Dilip Barad’s blog provides a detailed overview of Rasa Theory—the Indian concept of aesthetic flavor involving sentiments like Bhayānakam (terror) and Adbhutam (wonder)—none of the academic research papers in this collection explicitly use this framework to analyze Gun Island.

• The Gap: Most scholars use Western theoretical lenses, such as Campbell’s "Hero’s Journey" or Lévi-Strauss’s structuralism.

• Further Research: A study could evaluate how the "Navarasa" (nine rasas) are evoked in climate fiction to create a "thinking response" in the reader, rather than just using the Western "Cli-fi" definitions.


Digital Literary Cartography

One of the sources recommends a presentation on studying Gun Island through the lens of Digital Literary Cartography, but the actual methodology and findings are not detailed in the substantial research papers.

• The Gap: The sources discuss "mythic geographies" and the "intermeshing of cultures," but they do so through traditional literary analysis.

• Further Research: There is a gap for research that uses GIS mapping or digital tools to track the Gun Merchant’s 17th-century route against modern climate-induced migration patterns, providing a visual data-driven companion to Ghosh’s narrative.


Comparative Modern Climate Fiction (Cli-Fi)

Scholars in these sources frequently compare Ghosh to 20th-century modernists like T.S. Eliot, James Joyce, and Toni Morrison to highlight his use of myth.

• The Gap: There is very little comparative analysis between Ghosh and his contemporaries writing within the "ecological weird" or speculative fiction genres.

• Further Research: Future research could compare Gun Island with other modern climate novels (e.g., works by Richard Powers or Kim Stanley Robinson) to see if the "reactivation of myth" is a unique postcolonial strategy or a broader trend in the global Anthropocene.


Feminist Ecocriticism and Goddess Agency

The sources frame the goddess Manasa Devi as a "mediator" or a "trope for trade" and "nature’s power".

• The Gap: While the "nature-culture dualism" is discussed, there is a lack of deep feminist ecocritical analysis regarding why the agency of the environment is personified specifically as a female deity who uses "divine fury" to check male "profit motives".

• Further Research: A study could explore the gendered dimensions of Manasa Devi’s "wrath" and how it intersects with the subaltern status of characters like Moyna and Lubna.


Machine Translation and Global Semiotics

Prof. Barad raises a "Point to Ponder" regarding how Machine Translation (Google Translate) helps readers navigate the Italian and Bengali words that Ghosh leaves untranslated.

• The Gap: The research papers focus on "philological decoding" as a detective story but do not address the technological experience of the modern reader.

• Further Research: Research could examine how the "polyphony of language" in the Anthropocene is mediated by AI and digital translation tools, and whether this enhances or flattens the "etymological mystery" Ghosh intends to create.

Prompt 5: Draft literature review ending with hypotheses and research questions pertaining to this research gap.


This literature review examines the scholarly landscape surrounding Amitav Ghosh’s Gun Island, focusing on how the novel utilizes myth and migration to address the climate crisis, before proposing a new research direction through the lens of Indian Poetics (Rasa Theory).

Literature Review: Myth, Migration, and the Anthropocene

Current scholarship on Gun Island identifies it as a critical intervention in Anthropocene literature, designed to address the "Great Derangement"—the failure of modern realist fiction to capture the "wild, unthinkable" realities of climate change.

1. The Reactivation of Myth

The primary focus of recent research is Ghosh's "reactivation" of the Bengali legend of Manasa Devi and the Gun Merchant. Scholars argue that Ghosh uses myth not as a mere metaphor but as an active narrative framework to make planetary disruption intelligible.

  • Historification: Researchers like Dilip Barad utilize Bertolt Brecht’s concept of "historification"—setting action in the past to draw parallels with contemporary events—to explain how Ghosh encourages a "thinking response" in the reader.
  • Epistemological Tool: Myth is framed as a "survival manual" or a "trans-historical archive" that preserves ecological memories erased by official history.

2. Migrant Ecologies and (B)orders

A significant body of work explores the link between the mythological "wanderer" and the contemporary "climate refugee".

  • Trans-corporeality: Ashwarya Samkaria emphasizes trans-corporeality, arguing that human bodies in the novel are inseparable from their environment, which blurs the man-made borders of the nation-state.
  • Colonial Roots: Scholarship highlights that the current refugee crisis is presented as a direct consequence of European colonial exploitation of the planet’s natural resources.

3. Interspecies Kinship and the Uncanny

Scholars have noted that the novel "de-centers" the human protagonist, giving narrative agency to "more-than-human" actors like spiders, dolphins, and king cobras. This creates an experience of the uncanny, where the familiar environment becomes unsettlingly responsive to human action.

The Research Gap: Indian Poetics (Rasa Theory)

While current research extensively applies Western frameworks—such as Lévi-Strauss’s structuralism, Campbell’s hero’s journey, and ecocriticism—there is a notable absence of deep analysis using Indian Poetics, specifically Rasa Theory.

Prof. Dilip Barad defines Rasa as an "aesthetic flavor" or "sentiment" intended to transport an audience into a parallel reality where they reflect on spiritual and moral questions. Although the sources define the Navarasa (the nine sentiments), they do not apply them to analyze the reader's emotional and ethical journey through the climate catastrophes in Gun Island.

Hypotheses

  • H1: The "ecological weird" and "uncanny" elements of the novel are specifically constructed to evoke Bhayānakam (terror/horror) and Adbhutam (wonder/amazement), leading to a "thinking response" that Western "Cli-Fi" definitions alone cannot fully explain.
  • H2: The novel’s conclusion achieves a state of Śāntam (peace/tranquility), functioning as the "string of a jeweled necklace" that gives form to the preceding chaotic rasas, thereby facilitating the "deliverance" through the past that the protagonist seeks.

Research Questions

  1. How does the interplay between Bhayānakam (terror) and Kāruṇyam (compassion) in the portrayal of climate refugees (e.g., Rafi and Tipu) shift the reader’s ethical orientation toward the Anthropocene?
  2. In what ways does the Adbhutam (wonder) triggered by the "miracle" in the Venetian lagoon serve as a "moral technology of resilience" for the reader?
  3. To what extent does Ghosh’s use of historification align with the traditional goals of Rasa Theory to transport the audience into a "parallel reality" for moral reflection?

Featured Post

ThAct: R2020

  Revolution 2020 Novel by Chetan Bhagat Revolution 2020 is a modern Indian novel that tells the interconnected story of three young individ...

Popular Posts