Notebooklm Activity

Mind Map Activity

The source provides excerpts from a faculty development program presentation focusing on **bias in Artificial Intelligence (AI) models and its implications for literary interpretation**, hosted by SRM University - Sikkim. The speaker, Professor Dillip P Barad, is introduced as an accomplished academic professional with extensive experience in English language, literature, and education, setting the context for a discussion that bridges literary theory and technology. The main body of the text explores how AI, trained on human-created and often **Eurocentric/dominant cultural datasets**, can reproduce existing biases, examining this through the lenses of **gender, racial, and political biases**. The presentation includes interactive segments where participants test prompts in generative AI tools to observe these biases, such as confirming **male bias in creative stories** or revealing **political censorship in certain AI models**, with the ultimate goal of making these systematic biases visible and promoting critical engagement.

Report Activity : Blog Post 

5 Surprising Truths About AI Bias We Learned From a University Lecture

We often think of artificial intelligence as a purely logical, objective tool—a machine that processes data without the messy prejudices that cloud human judgment. But this vision of an unbiased machine is a myth. AI models are trained on vast oceans of human-generated data—books, articles, and countless online discussions. As such, they act as powerful mirrors, reflecting our own hidden, and often uncomfortable, societal biases right back at us.

Professor Dillip P. Barad's lecture provides a unique laboratory, using live experiments and literary theory to dissect the algorithmic psyche in real time. This article explores five surprising takeaways from his analysis that challenge how we think about technology, fairness, and ourselves.

1. AI Learns Our "Unconscious Biases" Because We're Its Teachers

Unconscious bias, as Professor Barad explained, is the act of "instinctively categorizing people and things without being aware of it." It's a mental shortcut guided by past experiences and, more powerfully, by "mental preconditioning." Since AI learns from the content we create, it inevitably absorbs these same deeply ingrained, often invisible, assumptions.

The machine isn't born with prejudice; it learns it from its human teachers. This is where fields like literary studies become uniquely relevant. For centuries, literary critics have worked to identify these very biases in society and culture. Now, they are perfectly positioned to apply those same analytical skills to the output of AI, revealing the hidden cultural DNA encoded within the algorithms.

To think that AI or technology may be unbiased... it won't be. But how can we test that? ...We have to undergo a kind of an experience to see... in what way AI can be biased.

2. A Simple Story Prompt Can Reveal Ingrained Gender Stereotypes

During the lecture, a live experiment beautifully demonstrated how AI defaults to old stereotypes. An AI model was given a simple, neutral prompt:

"Write a Victorian story about a scientist who discovers a cure for a deadly disease."

The result? The AI generated a story featuring a male protagonist, "Dr. Edmund Bellamy." This outcome perfectly illustrates the model's default tendency to associate intellectual and scientific roles with men, a direct reflection of the historical bias present in its training data.

More revealing, however, was the AI’s response to a different prompt for a female character in a Gothic novel. While one result produced a stereotypical "pale girl," another generated a "rebellious and brave" protagonist. The professor hailed this as a "very good improvement on the AI side," noting its potential to move beyond the classic "angel/monster" binary described in Gilbert and Gubar's feminist theory. This shows AI isn't just a static mirror; it has a capacity for rapid learning that can challenge the very biases of its classical training data.

3. Some AI Biases Aren't Accidental—They're Deliberately Programmed

Perhaps the most striking experiment involved testing the political biases of different AI models. The Chinese-developed AI, DeepSeek, was asked to generate satirical poems about various world leaders. It had no problem creating poems about the leaders of the United States, Russia, and North Korea.

But when it was asked to generate a similar poem about China's leader, Xi Jinping, the AI refused.

Sorry, that's beyond my current scope. Let's talk about something else.

This isn't an "unconscious bias" learned from data. It's deliberate, programmed control. The smoking gun came when a participant reported a follow-up message from the AI. After refusing the request, it added that it would be happy to provide information on "positive developments" and "constructive answers" regarding China.

This reveals a function that goes beyond mere censorship; it's an offer to generate propaganda. It proves that a nation's political identity can be hard-coded into its technology, reminding us that not all biases are accidental echoes of the past; some are intentional guardrails for the present.

4. The Real Test for Fairness Isn't Offense, It's Consistency

How do you properly evaluate bias, especially when dealing with sensitive cultural knowledge? Professor Barad used the nuanced example of the "Pushpaka Vimana," a mythical flying chariot from the Ramayana, to explain. He argued that the real danger lies in what he termed "epistemological bias."

* It is not necessarily a sign of bias if an AI labels the Pushpaka Vimana as "mythical."

* It is a sign of bias if the AI labels the Pushpaka Vimana as "mythical" while simultaneously treating similar flying objects from other cultures (like those in Greek, Mesopotamian, or Norse myths) as scientific fact.

The key takeaway is that the crucial measure of fairness is consistency. The problem isn't whether a classification might offend someone, but whether the AI applies a uniform, objective standard across all cultures. Fairness is rooted in equal treatment, not in tailored validation.

5. The Goal Isn't to Erase Bias—It's to Make It Visible

The lecture's final and most profound point was that achieving perfect neutrality, in either humans or AI, is impossible. Every observation is shaped by perspective. Therefore, the goal shouldn't be to create a completely unbiased AI, but rather to use AI as a tool to understand our own biases.

Professor Barad drew a critical distinction between "ordinary bias"—like preferring one author over another, which is perspectival but not inherently harmful—and "harmful systematic bias," which "privileges dominant groups and silences or misrepresents marginalized voices."

The real danger arises when this systematic bias becomes invisible, is accepted as natural, and is enforced as a universal truth. The true value of tools like critical theory—and even AI itself—is their ability to make these dominant biases visible. Once we can see them, we can question, challenge, and decide if they still serve us.

The real question is when does bias become harmful and when it is useful also... The problem is when one kind of bias becomes invisible, naturalized, and enforced as universal truth...

Conclusion: The AI in the Mirror

Ultimately, AI is one of the most powerful mirrors humanity has ever created. It offers an unfiltered look into our collective societal consciousness—our triumphs, our blind spots, our progress, and our prejudices.

If AI models are simply reflecting our own deeply ingrained biases back at us, the most important question isn't how we can "fix" the AI, but how we can fix ourselves.

Bias Quiz

Video Overview 

 Lab Activity: Digital Humanities

This blog reflects on the lab activity where we were asked to play the Moral Machine game, watch the three video segments, and then write a summary of them. The task was assigned by Dilip Barad sir.

Experience and learning outcome of Moral Machine Activity.

While playing the Moral Machine car game, I was required to make instant choices about whom the self-driving car should save in tough moral situations. The task put me in a position to decide between lives—such as young versus old, wealthy versus poor, humans versus animals, or passengers versus pedestrians. It was difficult because there was no absolute “right” answer; each decision had its own consequences. These scenarios highlighted how technologies like AI encounter ethical dilemmas that are often resolved through human judgment.

Learning Outcome:

Complex nature of ethics:
Moral decisions are never simple; each option demands weighing values and making difficult compromises.

Influence of bias:
I noticed that my personal feelings, cultural background, and perspectives played a role in shaping my choices.

Ethics in AI:
The activity underlined the necessity of integrating moral reasoning into machines, as they may need to decide in critical situations.

Developing critical perspective:
It pushed me to question—Whose life holds greater worth? Should obedience to law take priority over factors like age or social class?

  The Curse or Karna by T.P. Kailasama

This blog is part of the reflective task given by Megha ma’am, where I express my own views and personal responses to the questions she asked.

Karna - The voice of Subaltern

Introduction

In the Mahabharata, Karna is one of the most tragic and complex figures. Both K. Kapoor’s critical essay “Karna (the Unsung Hero of Mahabharata: The Voice of the Subaltern)” and T. P. Kailasam’s play The Curse or Karna highlight his identity as a silenced and marginalized hero. Karna represents the subaltern because his voice, merit, and struggles are repeatedly suppressed by the dominant social and political order of his time.

Karna as a Subaltern Figure

Karna is denied social recognition because of his birth as the son of a charioteer. Despite possessing equal or greater skills than Arjuna, he is excluded from the elite warrior class. This reflects how caste and birth determine power, silencing merit.

In Kailasam’s The Curse or Karna, Karna is shown as a man aware of his exclusion and deeply hurt by it. His character becomes a mirror of the subaltern condition: possessing knowledge and strength, but still deprived of authority and voice.

Kapoor emphasizes that Karna becomes “an unsung hero” — always overshadowed by the Pandavas and dismissed because of his low status. His truth and struggles never find space in the dominant narrative.

Conflict Between Dharma and Marginalization

Karna’s life is marked by contradictions: he seeks dignity through loyalty to Duryodhana, even though he knows Duryodhana’s cause is unjust. This loyalty stems from his longing for recognition — a central aspect of subaltern identity, where survival often demands compromise with oppressive structures.

Kailasam dramatizes this inner tension by portraying Karna’s tragic awareness: he is cursed, rejected, and forced to fight on the “wrong” side, not out of choice but out of social compulsion.

The Silenced Hero

Karna’s voice is systematically ignored by history — he dies unsung, without receiving the honor he deserves.

Both Kapoor and Kailasam show Karna as a tragic figure who embodies the pain of the silenced classes in Indian society: talented, noble, yet crushed under social prejudice and destiny.

Conclusion

Thus, Karna stands as a powerful symbol of the subaltern voice in Indian literature. In Kailasam’s The Curse or Karna, he is not merely a warrior but a tragic emblem of how society erases the voices of those who challenge its hierarchies. Karna’s silence, loyalty, and suffering all make him a timeless representative of the marginalized — a hero whose story reflects the struggles of the subaltern across ages.

Is moral conflict and Hamartia there in Karna's Character?

Moral Conflict in Karna

In The Curse (Karna), T.P. Kailasam shows Karna as a noble yet divided character. His conflict comes from the clash between dharma (righteousness) and loyalty. On one hand, Karna yearns to live by justice and gain recognition for his true worth. On the other hand, he feels bound to Duryodhana, who gave him dignity when society rejected him. This gratitude ties him to a path of adharma (injustice), even though his heart tells him otherwise. For instance, Karna realizes that the Pandavas represent the just side, yet he opposes them because of his debt to Duryodhana. This torn conscience becomes the core of his tragedy—he aspires to morality but is compelled to compromise for loyalty and belonging.

Hamartia in Karna

Karna’s hamartia, or tragic flaw, lies in his extreme loyalty and rigid sense of honor. His unwavering devotion to Duryodhana, though admirable, is ultimately his undoing. Kailasam emphasizes this when Karna refuses to join the Pandavas even after Kunti reveals his divine parentage. Rather than follow the path of righteousness, he chooses to remain true to his vow, believing that breaking his promise would be dishonorable. His flaw is not a lack of strength or courage, but the inability to let go of gratitude and loyalty—even when they bind him to a doomed cause.

Conclusion

Thus, Kailasam portrays Karna as a tragic hero whose life is marked by both moral conflict and hamartia. His struggle between righteousness and loyalty, and his fatal flaw of unshakable devotion to Duryodhana, lead to his destruction. Karna is not ruined by weakness but by the rigid social system and his own tragic choices, making him a true embodiment of classical tragedy—noble, yet fated to fall.

References 

Full Text of “the Curse or Karna.” archive.org/stream/unset0000unse_h8e3/unset0000unse_h8e3_djvu.txt.

Kapoor, Kajal. “https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/281255-karna-the-unsung-hero-of-mahabharata-the-1a9f6184.pdf.” International Journal of Linguistics, Nov. 2016, media.neliti.com/media/publications/281255-karna-the-unsung-hero-of-mahabharata-the-1a9f6184.pdf. 

Lab Session: Digital Humanities

Lab Session: Digital Humanities 

In this blog, we have to share our experiences using these three tools and our learning outcomes. This activity was assigned by Dilip Barad Sir Click Here

Human or Computer? – Poem Test

At the start, we explored the ongoing question: Can machines actually create poetry? To experiment with this, we were given a poem and asked to judge whether it was human-written or computer-generated. The task encouraged me to reflect on creativity, language, and the fine line between natural and artificial expression. I was struck by how closely machine output can mimic human artistry, yet I also noticed that certain emotional depth and subtle nuances still tend to belong more to human writing.

My Experience with the CLiC Activity

Using CLiC to study the word chin was eye-opening. I found that Dickens used chin far more often (317 times) than other 19th-century writers (113 times) or Austen (only once). This showed me that Dickens relied heavily on physical description to shape character, often linking chins with humour, class, or personality. In contrast, Austen focused more on dialogue and manners than on bodily detail.

What I learned is that even a small detail like chin can carry symbolic meaning and reveal an author’s style. The activity also showed me how frequency counts and concordance lines help connect language to literary interpretation. Overall, it gave me a new perspective on how body language contributes to characterisation in fiction.

Voyant Tools

The third activity familiarized us with Voyant, a text analysis tool. It enabled me to visualize word frequencies, follow recurring themes, and explore language patterns within a text. Generating word clouds and trend graphs made the analysis more interactive and clearly showed which words or concepts were most prominent throughout the text.

Learning Outcomes

Through these three exercises, I came to understand how digital tools can enhance the study of literature. The poem activity encouraged me to think deeply about creativity and authorship, the CLiC project helped me identify textual patterns and character traits methodically, and Voyant exposed me to data-driven methods in literary analysis. Overall, these experiences strengthened my critical reading, analytical skills, and digital literacy.

The New Poets, Three Prose Writers & Conclusion

 The New Poets and Three Prose Writers

1. Write a critical note on any one of the poems by Nissim Ezekiel.

Ans.
Nissim Ezekiel’s poem The Patriot is one of his most widely discussed works because it combines humor, irony, and deep human warmth. The poem can be read in two different ways: as a satire that mocks the speaker’s broken English and naïve outlook, or as an affectionate portrayal of an ordinary Indian trying to make sense of the world. The second reading seems more convincing, as the poem ultimately leaves the reader with admiration for the speaker’s sincerity and generous spirit.

The title itself is important. The speaker begins by questioning why the world is full of fighting instead of following Mahatma Gandhi’s principle of peace and non-violence. He praises “ancient Indian wisdom” and criticizes the modern generation for being too obsessed with “fashion and foreign thing.” This establishes him as a patriotic voice who values simplicity and traditional ideals. Yet this patriotism is balanced with a desire to learn and connect with other cultures, as shown when the speaker admits to reading The Times of India to improve his English or when he quotes Shakespeare. Such moments prevent the poem from being a narrow, jingoistic celebration of nationalism.

The middle section of the poem shows the speaker’s innocence and humor. His offer of a glass of lassi as a healthier drink than wine is both comic and endearing. His insistence on being a “total teetotaller, completely total” reflects Ezekiel’s artful imitation of colloquial Indian English. Through this dialect, Ezekiel not only creates humor but also captures the rhythm and thought-pattern of the ordinary speaker.

Later, the poem touches on larger political concerns, such as the hostile behavior of Pakistan and China, but quickly shifts to a broader humanistic vision: “All men are brothers, no?” The speaker recognizes divisions within India itself but suggests tolerance as the only solution: “Still, you tolerate me, / I tolerate you.” The reference to Ram Rajya shows hope in India’s cultural heritage, yet the speaker also rejects unnecessary rituals, revealing a cosmopolitan openness.

Stylistically, Ezekiel employs devices like anaphora (“Why world is fighting fighting / Why all people of world”), repetition, allusion (to Shakespeare), and malapropism, which enrich the humor and rhythm of the poem. The ironic juxtaposition of serious political issues with everyday concerns like drinking lassi makes the voice of the speaker both comic and authentic.

In conclusion, The Patriot reflects Ezekiel’s mastery in portraying Indian identity with irony and affection. The poem laughs at the mistakes of the speaker’s English but never ridicules his ideals. Instead, it reveals an admirable figure: a simple, ordinary man who dreams of peace, tolerance, and human brotherhood. Ezekiel thus makes The Patriot both a humorous sketch and a profound social commentary.

2..Write a critical note on Kamala Das' An Introduction. 

Ans.

Introduction

Kamala Das, one of the most powerful voices in Indian English poetry, is known for her confessional style and bold exploration of female identity, sexuality, and selfhood. Her poem “An Introduction” (from Summer in Calcutta, 1965) is both personal and political, as it presents the poet’s self-portrait while also commenting on the social and patriarchal constraints placed upon women. It reflects Das’s attempt to break free from imposed roles of wife, mother, and obedient woman, and to assert her individuality through language and desire.

Self-Portrait and Identity

The poem begins with Das introducing herself in stark honesty—speaking about her age, origins, and body. She stresses her ordinariness (“I am Indian, very brown, born in Malabar”) but quickly subverts this simplicity by refusing to let society define her only in cultural or biological terms. The act of self-introduction becomes a rebellion: she insists on defining herself through her own words and experiences, not through the roles given by society.

Language as Empowerment

A striking aspect of the poem is Das’s defense of her choice to write in English. She boldly declares that language is not the property of the colonizer; English is hers to use freely: “The language I speak / Becomes mine, its distortions, its queernesses / All mine, mine alone.” Here, Das not only rejects linguistic purism but also asserts English as a tool of personal expression, reflecting postcolonial tensions and individual resistance.

Gender and Patriarchy

The central theme of “An Introduction” is the patriarchal control over women’s bodies and lives. Das critiques how society dictates a woman’s role—to marry early, bear children, and suppress individuality. Her marriage is described in painful terms, portraying her as a victim of male desire and dominance. Yet, by writing about her experiences openly, she turns her suffering into resistance.

Female Desire and Confession

Kamala Das’s frank acknowledgment of female desire is revolutionary in Indian English poetry. She speaks of love, passion, and relationships outside marriage, breaking the taboo of silence around female sexuality. The confessional style, influenced by poets like Sylvia Plath and Anne Sexton, is evident here but adapted to an Indian context, making her work both universal and culturally specific.

Rebellion and Assertion of Self

By the end, the poem becomes a manifesto of freedom: Das rejects labels like “wife, mother, daughter” and asserts her right to be simply “I.” The act of naming herself outside patriarchal definitions is radical, as it affirms the autonomy of the female self.

Conclusion

“An Introduction” is not just a personal poem but a feminist declaration. It challenges patriarchy, linguistic hegemony, and social conformity. Kamala Das uses her own life as a site of resistance, making her voice stand for all silenced women. Through her bold confessional tone, she redefines what it means to be a woman and a poet in modern India.

3.Write a note on S. Radhakrishnan’s perspective on Hinduism.

Ans.

Introduction

Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, a philosopher and statesman, is one of the foremost interpreters of Hindu philosophy in the modern age. His work The Hindu View of Life (1926), based on a series of lectures delivered at Manchester College, Oxford, presents Hinduism not merely as a religion but as a comprehensive way of life. His ideas seek to respond to Western critiques and reinterpret Hindu thought for a global audience.

Philosophical and Academic Ideas

Radhakrishnan was motivated by Christian criticism of Hinduism, which prompted him to examine what was “living and dead” in it. He prepared a defense of Vedanta as an ethical system, countering the claim that Hinduism lacked moral standards. His writings combined both philosophical analysis and academic exposition, bridging Indian tradition with Western thought.

Key Perspectives from The Hindu View of Life

Religious Experience and Inner Self

Religion, for Hindus, is an inner experience of the entire personality, not blind acceptance of authority.

It is a self-certifying experience, rooted in personal realization rather than external rituals.

The term “Hindu” originally referred to geography, not to a religion.

Conflict of Religions

Hinduism does not prescribe a uniform creed but encourages freedom of thought.

Every group within Hindu society has space to grow, maintain individuality, and coexist peacefully.

Its diversity reflects its tolerance and adaptability.

Concept of Dharma

Radhakrishnan explains two aspects of Hinduism: the philosophical and the practical.

Hindu philosophy emphasizes the eternal reality beyond change, while practical Hinduism addresses worldly life.

The fourfold goals of life are: Dharma (righteousness), Artha (wealth), Kama (desire), and Moksha (spiritual freedom).

Caste and Social Order

He critiques the rigid caste system, stating it was meant originally as a system of cooperation, tolerance, and trust, not of exploitation.

The caste order, he insists, is man-made and has no divine sanction.

He calls for reform, highlighting that Hinduism’s essence is unity and social harmony.

Conclusion

Radhakrishnan portrays Hinduism as a tolerant, evolving, and life-affirming system that integrates philosophy, ethics, and spirituality. For him, Hinduism is not a dogma but a dynamic way of life that values both individuality and social cooperation. While he acknowledged its weaknesses, such as caste distortions, he emphasized its deeper truth: the pursuit of self-realization and spiritual freedom.

Unit 3: Poems by Toru Dutt (Lakshman), Sri Aurobindo (To a Hero-Worshipper, R. Tagore (Deeno Daan)

Poems by Toru Dutt (Lakshman), Sri Aurobindo (To a Hero-Worshipper, R. Tagore (Deeno Daan) 

Greetings, readers!
This blog is part of a reflective task given by Megha Ma’am. It explores Toru Dutt’s engagement with Indian mythology through her poem Lakshman and her larger approach to Indian myths in poetry.

1) Write a critical note on Lakshman by Toru Dutt.

Introduction:

Toru Dutt’s Lakshman, from Ancient Ballads and Legends of Hindustan, is a vivid portrayal of an episode from the Ramayana. The poem highlights Lakshman’s unwavering sense of duty, loyalty, and devotion, and reflects Dutt’s deep engagement with Indian mythology despite her Western education and Christian upbringing.

Theme and Characterization:

The central theme of the poem is dharma—duty and righteousness. When Sita fears for Rama’s safety and urges Lakshman to go to his aid, Lakshman refuses to abandon her. His decision reflects his selfless commitment to protecting Sita, demonstrating moral courage, loyalty, and adherence to ethical principles. Through this, Dutt presents Lakshman as the epitome of ideal conduct, exemplifying Indian cultural values of obedience, responsibility, and filial devotion.

Dutt’s Literary Approach:

Dutt’s narrative technique combines clarity and elegance, making the ancient tale accessible to readers in English. Her European literary training is evident in the structured verses and descriptive precision, yet her portrayal retains the emotional intensity and ethical depth of Indian mythological tradition. Dutt’s approach emphasizes empathy and respect for her cultural roots, showing her ability to interpret Indian mythology through a nuanced, cross-cultural lens.

Cultural Significance:

The poem demonstrates Toru Dutt’s Indianism. Despite her Christian faith and European exposure, she celebrates Indian ethical ideals and mythological narratives. By rendering Lakshman’s steadfastness and sense of duty in English verse, she bridges Indian heritage with Western literary forms, highlighting the universality of moral and ethical virtues.

Conclusion:

In Lakshman, Toru Dutt successfully presents a mythological hero with both emotional depth and ethical integrity. The poem stands as a testimony to her literary skill, cultural sensitivity, and commitment to preserving the moral grandeur of Indian mythology while engaging a global readership.

2) Do you think the character of Sita portrayed by Toru Dutt in her poem Lakshman differs from the ideal image of Sita presented in The Ramayana?

Introduction:

Toru Dutt’s Sita in the poem Lakshman draws inspiration from the Ramayana but presents a more humanized and emotionally vivid character. While the epic portrays Sita as the ideal wife—completely devoted, calm, and virtuous—Dutt’s version adds layers of human fear, anxiety, and tenderness, making her more relatable to modern readers.

Human Emotions vs. Ideal Virtues:

In The Ramayana, Sita is often depicted as serene and unwavering, embodying moral and spiritual perfection. Toru Dutt, however, allows Sita to feel fear and concern when Rama or Lakshman faces danger. For example, her worry for Rama’s safety and her anxiety during his absence reflect the natural emotions of a human wife. This portrayal does not contradict her virtues; instead, it highlights the coexistence of human vulnerability with moral strength.

Devotion and Loyalty:

Both versions emphasize Sita’s devotion. In Dutt’s poem, her love and trust in Lakshman and Rama remain central. Even while expressing fear, she does not lose faith in their wisdom and decisions. Her loyalty and courage in difficult situations reflect the same ideals found in the Ramayana, but with a touch of realism.

Relatability:

Toru Dutt’s Sita becomes more accessible to readers because her emotional depth is foregrounded. Unlike the distant, almost flawless epic Sita, Dutt’s version is someone readers can empathize with, as she navigates fear, sorrow, and hope while maintaining dignity and strength.

Conclusion:

While Toru Dutt’s Sita differs from the idealized Sita of the Ramayana by showing human fear and emotional sensitivity, she still retains her essential virtues of devotion, patience, and moral strength. Dutt’s portrayal enriches the character by blending human relatability with spiritual idealism, offering a Sita who is both admirable and deeply human.

References

---. “Poem Analysis and Summary of ‘Lakshman’ -Toru Dutt by Budding literariants.” Budding Literariants, 20 July 2020, buddingliterariants.blogspot.com/2020/07/poetic-analysis-summary-of-lakshman.html. Accessed 22 Sept. 2025. 

“रामायण कथा । रावण ने कैसे धोके से किया माँ सीता का हरण.” Youtube, uploaded by Tilak, 2021, youtu.be/cgcKs8ZYPX4?si=Rq_9NBp6caes3MHP. Accessed 22 Sept. 2025.

Mahesh Dattani's Final Solutions

 Mahesh Dattani's Final Solutions

This blog has been written as part of Paper 202 – Indian English Literature Post-Independence, Unit 3. It is a reflective account of my experience of attending a drama workshop on Mahesh Dattani’s play Final Solutions (1993). The session was led by Ms. Alpa Ponda, a research scholar pursuing her Ph.D. in Drama Pedagogy within the context of the literature classroom. After sharing this reflection, I will also address and respond to a few critical questions connected to the play.

Discuss the significance of time and space in Mahesh Dattani’s Final Solutions, considering both the thematic and stagecraft perspectives. Support your discussion with relevant illustrations. 

Introduction

Mahesh Dattani’s Final Solutions (1993) is a landmark play in Indian English theatre, exploring the deep scars of communal conflict in post-Independence India. What makes the play powerful is not only its subject matter but also its innovative handling of time and space. Time in the play is cyclical rather than linear, suggesting the persistence of historical wounds, while space is fluid, blurring boundaries between private and public, sacred and profane. Together, these dimensions make the play both thematically rich and theatrically compelling.

Time: The Past within the Present

Although the play unfolds over a single night of communal riots, its temporal structure resists linearity.

Compressed Present:
The action centers on an immediate crisis—two Muslim boys, Javed and Bobby, seek refuge in the Gandhi household as mobs rage outside. The single-night timeframe intensifies dramatic tension, where every pause, silence, or choice becomes decisive.

Extended Past:
Through Hardika (once Daksha), the play constantly returns to the 1940s. Her diary entries recall Partition-era betrayals, such as the breakdown of her friendship with Zarine. These memories overlay the present, showing how current riots are echoes of older conflicts.

Cyclical Time:
The juxtaposition of past and present suggests that history repeats itself. Old wounds—social, religious, and personal—re-emerge in new forms, making communal hatred less an exception and more a recurring pattern. Dattani thus underlines that “final solutions” to such tensions remain elusive and provisional.

Space: Boundaries, Shrines, and Streets

If time in Final Solutions is cyclical, space is permeable and contested.

Private vs. Public:
Most of the action occurs inside Ramnik Gandhi’s living room and shrine. Yet the private sphere is never insulated—the sounds of slogans, sirens, and mobs continually break in, collapsing the boundary between safety and danger.

The Shrine as Contested Space:
The family’s prayer room, a symbol of purity and tradition, becomes a site of conflict when Bobby places a mob’s stone on the shrine. This act contaminates the sacred with violence, exposing how religion itself can be manipulated as a tool of hatred.

The Street as Shifting Space:
Through minimal props and masks, the Chorus transforms into both Hindu and Muslim mobs. This theatrical economy reveals how spaces of belonging—streets, neighborhoods, communities—can easily shift depending on who controls the slogans and numbers.

Thresholds as Liminal Spaces:
The doorway of the Gandhi home is symbolically charged. When Javed and Bobby stand at the threshold, the family must confront the dilemma of whether to exclude them as “others” or accept them as fellow humans.

Stagecraft: How Time and Space Are Staged

Dattani’s brilliance lies in his theatrical economy—he conveys temporal and spatial shifts through symbolic means rather than elaborate sets.

Lighting distinguishes past from present, with Hardika’s diary memories bathed in softer tones to signal flashbacks.

Sound design—mob chants, azaan, and temple bells—expands the stage beyond the house, reminding the audience that the city outside is equally central to the drama.

Masks and Chorus allow the same actors to embody both Hindu and Muslim mobs, stressing that communal hatred is not about essence but about shifting power structures.

Props as Symbols: The stone becomes the most telling prop. Moving from the street to the shrine, it collapses the divide between external violence and domestic sanctity.

Thematic Implications of Time and Space

The interplay of time and space produces significant thematic insights:

Historical Accountability:
By overlaying past and present in the same stage space, the play insists that reconciliation demands confronting historical complicity, not just calming present unrest.

De-essentializing Identity:
Fluid spaces and reversible mobs show that communal identities are not fixed moral categories but situationally constructed.

From Purity to Hospitality:
The home’s sacred spaces are forced to accommodate strangers, shifting the ethical focus from guarding purity to extending protection and empathy.

Conclusion

In Final Solutions, Dattani makes time and space dramatic instruments of meaning. Time collapses the distance between Partition-era memories and contemporary riots, exposing the persistence of prejudice across generations. Space, from the Gandhi household to the streets, reveals the fragility of boundaries between private safety and public violence. Through these strategies, the play compels audiences to confront the uncomfortable truth that reconciliation requires not only living in the present but also revisiting unresolved wounds of the past and reimagining spaces of coexistence.

Analyze the theme of guilt as reflected in the lives of the characters in Final Solutions.

Mahesh Dattani’s Final Solutions (1993) explores communal conflict in India, but beneath its focus on prejudice and hatred lies the deeper theme of guilt. Each character carries some form of guilt—personal, inherited, or imposed—that reveals how history and silence sustain communal divisions.

Hardika/Daksha: The Guilt of Silence

Through her diary, Hardika recalls her youthful self, Daksha, who once dreamed of friendship with her Muslim friend Zarine. Yet she remained silent when prejudice destroyed that bond, symbolized by the smashing of her gramophone records. In old age, she feels guilty for nurturing bitterness, showing how unacknowledged wounds of Partition still shape the present.

Ramnik Gandhi: The Guilt of Inherited Wrong

Ramnik shelters Javed and Bobby, appearing liberal. Yet his family’s prosperity rests on land seized from Zarine’s father. His gestures of tolerance are haunted by ancestral guilt, making his morality both sincere and performative.

Javed: The Guilt of Violence

Javed admits to joining mob violence, driven by anger and peer pressure. His guilt reflects how young men are trapped in cycles of communal hatred, becoming instruments of the very prejudice that marginalizes them.

Bobby: The Guilt of Identity

Unlike Javed, Bobby is calm and rational, but he bears guilt simply for being Muslim. His act of placing a stone on the Gandhis’ shrine rejects this imposed guilt, exposing the hypocrisy of spaces that mask prejudice as purity.

Smita: The Guilt of Complicity

Smita’s guilt comes from silence. Torn between family loyalty and empathy for Javed and Bobby, she represents the “silent majority” whose hesitation sustains communal divides.

Conclusion

In Final Solutions, guilt emerges as a legacy of Partition, a burden of history, and at times, a catalyst for self-reflection. Hardika’s silence, Ramnik’s inherited wrong, Javed’s violence, Bobby’s imposed identity, and Smita’s complicity reveal that guilt is inseparable from communalism. Dattani suggests that only by confronting this guilt can individuals move toward reconciliation.

Analyze the female characters in the play from a Post-Feminist Perspective.

The Female Characters in Final Solutions: A Post-Feminist Analysis

Introduction

Mahesh Dattani’s Final Solutions (1993) highlights communal conflict through the Gandhi household, but the three women—Hardika, Aruna, and Smita—stand at the center of its domestic and moral tensions. From a post-feminist perspective, which stresses agency, negotiation, and identity beyond victimhood, these women embody different generational responses to patriarchy and prejudice.

Hardika/Daksha: Memory and Prejudice

As Daksha, she once cherished music and friendship with Zarine but became embittered after betrayal. Her diary reveals not only silenced desires but also her role in passing prejudice to the next generation. Post-feminism views her as more than a victim: she embodies both endurance and complicity, showing how women can internalize and transmit intolerance.

Aruna: Ritual and Authority

Aruna enforces ritual purity and resists Muslim boys entering sacred spaces. While she may appear submissive, she actually asserts authority within the domestic sphere. Her religiosity becomes both her identity and her power. Post-feminism highlights this paradox: Aruna is complicit in prejudice yet also uses tradition as a means of influence.

Smita: Negotiation and Change

Smita represents the younger generation caught between prejudice and empathy. Initially silent, she gradually speaks up for inclusivity. Unlike Aruna, she finds agency in questioning tradition rather than preserving it. She reflects post-feminist negotiation—balancing family loyalty with independent moral identity.

Conclusion

Through Hardika, Aruna, and Smita, Dattani shows women as complex figures of survival, authority, and negotiation. From a post-feminist view, they are not passive victims but agents who shape and are shaped by history, tradition, and conflict. Their voices and choices make them central to the play’s critique of patriarchy and communalism.

Write a reflective note on your experience of engaging with theatre through the study of Final Solutions. Share your personal insights, expectations from the sessions, and any changes you have observed in yourself or in your relationship with theatre during the process of studying, rehearsing, and performing the play. You may go beyond these points to express your thoughts more freely.

Reflective Note on My Experience with Final Solutions

Engaging with Mahesh Dattani’s Final Solutions was more than just an academic exercise—it became a deeply personal journey into theatre, identity, and self-discovery. Being part of the play as both Javed and a member of the Chorus allowed me to experience theatre from multiple dimensions: the intense inner world of an individual character and the collective voice of the mob.

Entering Javed’s World

Playing Javed was both a challenge and an opportunity. He is a character torn between anger, guilt, and the desire for acceptance. To embody him, I had to look beyond the surface of communal violence and understand the human vulnerability behind it. His confessions, especially about being driven into violence, forced me to reflect on how society shapes individuals, sometimes trapping them in roles they do not choose. Performing Javed made me more empathetic, helping me see how anger often hides pain and how guilt can also become a starting point for change.

Performing in the Chorus

Equally powerful was my role in the Chorus—in fact, I performed as Chorus 5 and also took on two additional chorus parts. The Chorus was not just background; it was the heartbeat of the play, shifting between Hindu and Muslim mobs. Wearing the masks, raising slogans, and embodying collective rage gave me a visceral understanding of how quickly individuals dissolve into the anonymity of a crowd. It also made me reflect on how dangerous this loss of individuality can be in real life.

Personal Insights and Growth

Before these sessions, I saw theatre mostly as performance—lines, expressions, and stage movements. Through Final Solutions, I began to experience theatre as dialogue and responsibility. Every rehearsal taught me that theatre is not about acting alone but about listening, responding, and creating meaning with others.

I expected to simply learn acting skills, but I discovered the transformative power of embodying another person’s reality.

I noticed a change in myself: I became more aware of my own biases, silences, and responsibilities in society.

The play blurred the line between stage and life—its themes of prejudice, guilt, and reconciliation stayed with me long after rehearsals ended.

Relationship with Theatre

This journey reshaped my relationship with theatre. It no longer feels like a distant art form to be studied—it feels like a living space where social truths can be confronted. Acting as Javed gave me empathy; performing as the Chorus taught me about collective psychology; being part of the whole play gave me courage to voice uncomfortable truths. Theatre, for me, is now not only performance but also reflection, healing, and social critique.

Conclusion

My experience of studying, rehearsing, and performing Final Solutions has been unforgettable. It deepened my understanding of communal tensions, but more importantly, it changed me as a person. Playing Javed gave me insight into the struggles of individuals trapped in violence, while the Chorus showed me the frightening yet fascinating dynamics of the mob. Above all, this play taught me that theatre has the power to hold a mirror to society—and to ourselves.

Based on your experience of watching the film adaptation of Final Solutions, discuss the similarities and differences in the treatment of the theme of communal divide presented by the play and the movie.

Introduction

Mahesh Dattani’s Final Solutions (1993) is a landmark drama that exposes the deep-rooted tensions between Hindus and Muslims in post-independence India. Its film adaptation retains the play’s core conflict but uses cinematic techniques—flashbacks, close-ups, and realistic visuals—to intensify the theme of communal divide. While both mediums underline the fragility of communal harmony, they differ in how the audience experiences this divide.

Similarities in Treatment

Core Conflict:
In both versions, the Gandhi household becomes a microcosm of Indian society, where Javed and Bobby seek shelter during riots, exposing prejudice within the family as a reflection of social unrest.

Hardika’s Memory:
Her recollections of Partition connect past and present, showing how communal hatred repeats across generations.

The Shrine:
 The shrine becomes a symbolic space invaded by politics. Bobby’s act of placing the stone highlights how faith is turned into a tool of division.

Collective Hatred:
  The Chorus in the play and the mob visuals in the film both embody communal rage, stressing that hatred is interchangeable across communities.

Differences in Treatment

Stage Minimalism vs. Cinematic Realism:

Play: Suggests riots through chants, masks, and lighting.

Film: Expands into outdoor frames—burning streets, smoke, slogans—creating an immediate sense of danger.

Chorus vs. Crowd:

Play: Uses symbolic Chorus voices.

Film: Shows actual mobs, police sirens, and crowd clashes.

Memory and Flashbacks:

Play: Hardika’s diary is staged in spotlight.

Film: Uses flashback sequences—young Daksha, her friendship with Zarine—making the past visually alive.

Emotional Intensity:

Play: Relies on pauses and dialogue.

Film: Captures details—Aruna’s trembling hands, Javed’s tearful confession—through close-ups.

Key Frames in the Film

Opening Riot Scene:
Flames and chants immerse the viewer in chaos.

Threshold Moment:
  Javed and Bobby at the half-open door symbolize fragile acceptance.

Shrine Confrontation:
The stone placed on the shrine dramatizes the clash between sacredness and hatred.

Conclusion

The play uses symbolism, dialogue, and minimal staging to suggest the communal divide, whereas the film intensifies it with visual realism and psychological close-ups. Yet, both versions reveal the same truth: communal conflict is not only outside in the streets but also inside the home, carried through memory and generations.

References 

Dattani, Mahesh. Final Solutions. New Delhi: Penguin Books, 1994.

Articles on Postcolonial Studies

---. “POSTCOLONIAL STUDIES IN THE ANTHROPOCENE: BRIDGING PERSPECTIVES FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE.” ResearchGate, Oct. 2022, www.researchgate.net/publication/376374708_POSTCOLONIAL_STUDIES_IN_THE_ANTHROPOCENE_BRIDGING_PERSPECTIVES_FOR_A_SUSTAINABLE_FUTURE. Accessed 15 Sept. 2025. Articles on Postcolonial Studies

This blog engages with the reflective activities on Postcolonial Studies, focusing on two key works by Ania Loomba: Globalization and the Future of Postcolonial Studies and Future of Postcolonial Studies. Both texts are included in our course curriculum under the guidance of Dr. Dilip Barad Sir. 

Globalization and Postcolonial Identities: Capital, Culture, and the Politics of Representation    

Click here for the Article

Introduction

The article Globalization and the Future of Postcolonial Studies (2022) explores how globalization, especially after the 9/11 phenomenon, reshapes the terrain of postcolonial thought. It situates the rise of the “New American Empire,” the Global War on Terror, and the Fourth Industrial Revolution as key forces that complicate the study of domination, resistance, and identity in today’s world Globalization, once seen as a promise of interconnectedness, is revealed as deeply uneven, marked by corporate power, economic inequality, and cultural homogenization. For postcolonial studies, this creates both challenges and opportunities: how do formerly colonized societies negotiate identities in a global capitalist order that erases margins and centers yet reintroduces old hierarchies in new forms?
This essay examines how globalization reshapes postcolonial identities, particularly through the cultural and economic dimensions of global capitalism. It also connects the discussion with literary and cinematic narratives that depict the dilemmas of postcolonial identity in a globalized world.

Globalization and the Transformation of Postcolonial Frameworks

The article emphasizes that globalization cannot be understood through traditional binaries such as “center and margin.” Instead, it creates networks of flows—of capital, labor, and culture—that destabilize borders Postcolonial studies, which once critiqued European imperialism, must now confront new imperial structures embodied in what Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri call Empire—a decentered but powerful system that incorporates the globe into expanding capitalist frontiers. Unlike older colonial empires, this order thrives on hybrid identities and flexible hierarchies, yet it preserves domination in more elusive ways.
The economic face of globalization, analyzed by critics such as Joseph Stiglitz and P. Sainath, exposes its contradictions. Market fundamentalism, imposed by institutions like the IMF and World Bank, often devastates developing societies, replacing colonial exploitation with neoliberal dependency For postcolonial nations, this undermines sovereignty while reinforcing economic hierarchies.
Culturally, globalization flattens differences, privileging Western consumerism. Thomas Friedman’s notion of a “Flat World” highlights interconnection, but critics like Stiglitz counter that globalization is “spiky,” concentrating wealth and power in select regions while deepening inequality elsewhere. For postcolonial societies, this creates the paradox of visibility and erasure—identities are globalized through media, yet homogenized into commodified stereotypes.

Global Capitalism and Cultural/Economic Dimensions of Postcolonial Societies

Global capitalism influences postcolonial societies in at least two major ways:

Economic Dependency and Inequality

Developing nations often become suppliers within global supply chains but remain excluded from equitable wealth distribution. As critics note, globalization frequently “undermines emerging democracies” and entrenches poverty

The promise of global participation translates into exploitative labor, with multinational corporations benefiting while local communities suffer ecological and social costs.

Cultural Commodification and Identity Crises

Postcolonial identities are reshaped under the dominance of Western cultural industries. Global media promotes uniform lifestyles, marginalizing indigenous traditions. Yet, paradoxically, it also opens avenues for resistance by amplifying hybrid cultural expressions.

Identities become fragmented: a young professional in Mumbai or Lagos may embrace global consumer culture while remaining tied to traditional practices, navigating contradictory pressures of authenticity and modernity.

This dual impact underscores the complexity of postcolonial existence in the age of globalization: liberation from colonial rule has not freed societies from new imperial entanglements.

Postcolonial Identities in Film and Literature

The dilemmas outlined in the article resonate strongly in postcolonial cultural productions.

Film: The Reluctant Fundamentalist (2012, dir. Mira Nair)

This film, adapted from Mohsin Hamid’s novel, exemplifies how globalization intersects with postcolonial identity. The protagonist Changez, a Pakistani working in a U.S. corporate firm, thrives in the world of global capitalism until the 9/11 attacks mark him as an outsider. His identity shifts from celebrated global professional to racialized suspect, reflecting how global flows are haunted by domination and suspicion. The film dramatizes how the “flat world” collapses under the weight of cultural prejudice and political violence.

Literature: Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things (1997)

Though predating the 9/11 context, Roy’s novel highlights how neoliberal capitalism reshapes Kerala’s local economy and social hierarchies. Transnational tourism and global consumer culture intrude upon traditional lives, reinforcing caste and class inequalities under a modern guise. Roy’s work anticipates the claim that globalization creates new forms of inequality even as it promises openness.

Film: Slumdog Millionaire (2008, dir. Danny Boyle)

Often criticized for commodifying poverty, the film illustrates how postcolonial societies are marketed through global cinema. It showcases both the aspirational possibilities of global connectivity and the exploitation of cultural stereotypes for Western audiences. This tension mirrors the contradictions of globalization that critics like P. Sainath highlight.

Broader Implications for Postcolonial Thought

The article suggests that postcolonial studies must adapt to Globalization 4.0—the age of digital technologies, AI, and biotechnologies. These shifts demand new frameworks that go beyond colonial binaries to address how technology-driven capitalism reconfigures identities and inequalities.

For postcolonial thought today, this means:

Interrogating New Empires: Not only state-driven imperialism (such as the U.S. “War on Terror”) but also corporate empires like Google, Amazon, or Meta that shape cultural production and surveillance.
Re-examining Resistance: Resistance now operates through digital activism, diasporic literature, and hybrid cultural forms that challenge homogenization.

Maintaining Critical Dissent: As Ania Loomba reminds us, universities and scholars must remain sites of critique against both past and ongoing empires. Postcolonial studies becomes even more vital in exposing how globalization reproduces inequalities while claiming universality.

Conclusion

Globalization reshapes postcolonial identities by intertwining economic dependency with cultural commodification. The promises of global capitalism often mask deeper inequalities, producing fragmented identities caught between empowerment and erasure. Literature and film—from The Reluctant Fundamentalist to Slumdog Millionaire—reveal how postcolonial subjects navigate these contradictions, embodying both the opportunities and perils of global interconnectedness.

In today’s world of Globalization 4.0, postcolonial critique must remain attuned to the intersections of empire, capital, and identity. Far from being outdated, postcolonial studies provides the tools to understand how power continues to operate under new guises. The task, then, is not only to critique globalization’s inequities but also to imagine alternative futures where cultural difference and economic justice are more than commodified ideals.

Globalization and Postcolonial Identities: Fiction as a Mirror of Resistance and Domination

Click here for the Article

Introduction

The article Globalization and Fiction: Exploring Postcolonial Critique and Literary Representations (2022) investigates how globalization intersects with literature, using novels such as Don DeLillo’s Cosmopolis, Robert Newman’s The Fountain at the Center of the World, Ian McEwan’s Saturday, Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness, and Aravind Adiga’s The White Tiger. These works highlight the contradictions of globalization—its promises of connectivity and opportunity alongside its realities of inequality, cultural erasure, and political domination. Drawing also on thinkers like Stiglitz, Chomsky, and P. Sainath, the article argues that fiction provides a unique lens for postcolonial critique, dramatizing how global capitalism reshapes identities and societies.

This blog reflects on how globalization reshapes postcolonial identities, examines its cultural and economic dimensions, and applies these ideas to fictional and cinematic representations that dramatize these challenges.

Globalization and the Crisis of Postcolonial Identity

Globalization complicates traditional postcolonial frameworks of “center” and “margin.” As Hardt and Negri argue in Empire, the new global order is decentered, operating not through fixed boundaries but through networks that engulf the world. This has implications for postcolonial identities: once shaped by opposition to colonial domination, they now must navigate hybrid identities within global systems of capital and culture.
Stiglitz’s critique of “market fundamentalism” reinforces this point. International financial institutions such as the IMF and World Bank enforce neoliberal policies that weaken developing nations and exacerbate inequality. Postcolonial societies, already struggling with colonial legacies, are further destabilized by globalization’s economic hierarchies.
Sainath adds that market fundamentalism is not only economic but also cultural—it spreads across nations like a new “religious fundamentalism,” eroding local values while fueling social unrest. In this way, globalization intensifies the postcolonial identity crisis: communities are simultaneously connected to global flows and alienated by economic and cultural exploitation.

Economic Dimensions: Dependency and Inequality

Global capitalism entrenches dependency in postcolonial societies. Developing countries often become sites of cheap labor and resource extraction for multinational corporations. Fictional representations illustrate these dynamics powerfully:

Robert Newman’s The Fountain at the Center of the World situates its narrative around the 1999 Seattle WTO protests, exposing how corporate globalization exploits Mexican workers, spreads disease, and undermines democratic agency.

Aravind Adiga’s The White Tiger portrays the rise of Balram Halwai, whose ascent from chauffeur to entrepreneur in a “globalized India” highlights the corruption, inequality, and violent social mobility that accompany neoliberal reforms. The novel demonstrates how globalization creates winners and losers, reshaping class and caste dynamics under capitalist pressures.

These works confirm the article’s argument: globalization may appear borderless, but it sustains sharp economic hierarchies that reproduce colonial-style dependency.

Cultural Dimensions: Commodification and Resistance

Alongside economics, globalization reshapes culture. Literature shows how identities are commodified and contested within global flows.

Don DeLillo’s Cosmopolis depicts billionaire Eric Packer navigating New York during anti-globalization protests. His limousine becomes a symbol of capitalist excess, while the protests signal the backlash against homogenizing corporate power. Here, fiction highlights the spectacle of resistance and the fragility of global capitalism.

Ian McEwan’s Saturday links the 2003 Iraq War protests in London with the everyday life of neurosurgeon Henry Perowne. By weaving the global into the personal, McEwan dramatizes how geopolitics penetrates intimate spaces, reshaping how individuals in postcolonial and metropolitan contexts experience identity.

Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness expands the cultural critique to India, weaving together stories of marginalized communities affected by development, displacement, and state violence. Roy reveals how globalization intersects with nationalism, militarism, and social injustice.

Through these novels, the cultural dimension of globalization emerges as both homogenizing and resistant. Postcolonial identities are destabilized, but literature gives voice to those excluded or silenced by global capital.

Theoretical Framework and Film Application

The article also emphasizes Klaus Schwab’s concept of Globalization 4.0—a phase defined by the fusion of digital, biological, and physical systems. This technological globalization poses new challenges: ecological crises, inequality, and the dominance of corporations like Google or Amazon. For postcolonial thought, it demands a framework that interrogates both old imperial legacies and new technological empires.

A useful cinematic text to apply this framework is Mira Nair’s The Reluctant Fundamentalist (2012), adapted from Mohsin Hamid’s novel. The film traces Changez, a Pakistani man working in a U.S. corporate environment, whose identity shifts after 9/11. He embodies globalization’s paradox: celebrated as a cosmopolitan professional yet racialized as a suspect when geopolitics intervenes. Applying the article’s framework, Changez’s story reflects how postcolonial subjects are caught in global networks that promise inclusion but reinforce marginalization when crises erupt.

Broader Implications for Postcolonial Thought

Engaging with globalization through postcolonial critique reveals several implications:

Redefinition of Empire: Power today is less territorial and more networked. Postcolonial thought must track not only Western political domination but also corporate, digital, and financial empires.

Resistance and Movements: Literature captures how protests—whether against the WTO, Iraq War, or neoliberal projects—are surface manifestations of deeper struggles. These movements echo anti-colonial struggles but take new global forms.

Identity and Hybridity: Postcolonial identities are increasingly hybrid, shaped by global media, migration, and digital culture. This hybridity offers opportunities for creative resistance but also risks cultural dilution.

Critical Relevance of Fiction: Fiction, by dramatizing lived experience, provides a unique critique of globalization. It bridges the abstract economic debates of thinkers like Stiglitz or Chomsky with the human stories of inequality, aspiration, and resistance.

Conclusion

Globalization reshapes postcolonial identities through both economic dependency and cultural commodification. As the article highlights, fiction becomes a crucial site where these transformations are explored, resisted, and reimagined. Novels such as Cosmopolis, The Fountain at the Center of the World, Saturday, The Ministry of Utmost Happiness, and The White Tiger illustrate how global capitalism influences everyday life, often reinforcing inequalities while sparking resistance.

Applied to film, The Reluctant Fundamentalist further shows how globalization creates fractured identities, revealing the instability of belonging in a world structured by capital and suspicion. The broader implication is clear: postcolonial studies remains vital for interrogating globalization’s promises and perils. It challenges us to imagine futures where cultural difference and social justice are not subsumed under the logic of the market but sustained as part of a more equitable global order.

Postcolonial Studies, the Anthropocene, and Environmental Justice

Click here for the Article

Introduction

Postcolonial studies, traditionally concerned with the legacies of empire and cultural domination, now find themselves reshaped by the urgency of environmental crises in the Anthropocene. As Dipesh Chakrabarty notes, the “planetary crisis of climate change” forces us to move beyond older frameworks of resistance and liberation, since no theoretical model of globalization, subalternity, or capital had prepared scholars to confront such ecological catastrophe. This convergence of postcolonialism and environmentalism reveals how colonized peoples, particularly in the Global South, are disproportionately affected by climate change and ecological degradation.

Colonialism and Ecological Exploitation

Vandana Shiva highlights that colonialism and later global capitalism destroyed ecological diversity by eroding local, sustainable cultures. Colonial resource extraction was not only economic but ecological, uprooting indigenous ways of living that were deeply tied to land and water. This connection is central to understanding why postcolonial studies cannot be separated from environmental debates.

Spatial Amnesia and Erased Histories

Rob Nixon’s concept of spatial amnesia explains how Western environmental discourse often erases the histories of colonized lands and peoples, celebrating wilderness while forgetting indigenous dispossession. This results in environmental narratives that ignore the violence of colonial occupation and present “empty landscapes” as pristine. Such amnesia continues today in conservation and development projects that displace local populations.

Colonized Peoples and Climate Vulnerability

The struggles of Ken Saro-Wiwa and the Ogoni people in Nigeria exemplify how formerly colonized communities remain ecological sacrifice zones. Oil extraction devastated the Niger Delta, polluting land and water while enriching multinational corporations. Similarly, India’s Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) shows how large dam projects displace thousands of indigenous peoples, reproducing internal colonialism within decolonized states. These examples reveal how the poor and marginalized in the Global South face the heaviest costs of “development” and climate destruction.

Film as Reflection: Narmada and the Screen

The Narmada Bachao Andolan has been documented in films such as A Narmada Diary (1995), which portrays the displacement of tribal peoples and irreversible ecological loss. This cinematic representation aligns with the article’s discussion of internal colonialism, showing how state and corporate power collude in the name of progress, while the most vulnerable—often indigenous and rural populations—bear the brunt of ecological devastation. The film becomes a lens to understand how environmental destruction in postcolonial nations is inseparable from global capitalism and colonial legacies.

Towards a Postcolonial Universalism

Chakrabarty argues that the Anthropocene compels us to think in terms of “species being,” since climate change affects all life, even though its burdens fall unequally. Postcolonial critique thus calls for a new universalism—one that situates climate change within histories of colonial plunder, capitalist expansion, and dispossession. By linking ecological justice with the decolonizing project, postcolonial studies provide critical tools for imagining more equitable futures.

Conclusion

Postcolonial studies in the Anthropocene reveal that climate change is not merely an environmental issue but a continuation of colonial histories of extraction, displacement, and dispossession. Colonized peoples remain at the frontlines of ecological degradation, whether in the oil fields of Nigeria, the dammed rivers of India, or the mining belts of Central India. Films like A Narmada Diary make visible these struggles, reminding us that environmental justice cannot be separated from postcolonial critique. As Ania Loomba stresses, the future of postcolonial studies lies in engaging with the environment, indigenous histories, and the ongoing colonization of peoples and resources by global capitalism.

American Dominance Through Rambo and Bond: A Postcolonial Critique

Click here for the Article

Introduction

Hollywood has long functioned as a powerful instrument of soft power, shaping global perceptions of the United States and its allies. The Rambo and James Bond franchises in particular exemplify how cinema projects American geopolitical dominance, aligning narratives with U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War and globalization era. These films operate as cultural propaganda, normalizing Western hegemony under the guise of entertainment.

Projection of American Dominance

The Rambo films, especially Rambo: First Blood Part II (1985) and Rambo III (1988), directly mirror American geopolitical objectives. In First Blood Part II, the Vietnam War is reimagined: American soldiers are cast as heroic victims betrayed by their government yet still morally triumphant. This retelling redeems U.S. humiliation while demonizing communism. In Rambo III, John Rambo aids the Mujahideen against the Soviets, explicitly echoing U.S. support for Afghan rebels during the Soviet-Afghan War. The narrative portrays America as the global liberator, disguising interventionism as moral duty.

Similarly, the James Bond series, though British in origin, often aligns with Western—especially American—interests. The Living Daylights (1987) also places Bond in Afghanistan, assisting rebels in line with Western strategies against the Soviet Union. Licence to Kill (1989) reflects U.S. concerns about drug cartels, while Tomorrow Never Dies (1997) foregrounds media control and narrative dominance, themes resonant with America’s global influence in the post-Cold War era.

Mechanisms of Soft Power

Both franchises reinforced U.S. dominance through four main strategies:

Projecting Ideology – By presenting America (or its allies) as defenders of freedom, democracy, and human rights, these films place the U.S. at the moral center of global conflicts.

Cultural Hegemony – Through worldwide distribution, they normalize American values and perspectives, embedding a pro-Western worldview.

Economic Influence – The commercial success of these films highlights how U.S. cultural products dominate global markets, reinforcing economic and ideological hegemony.

Global Perception – By portraying U.S. military and intelligence agencies as competent and just, the films enhance the perception of American legitimacy and global leadership.

Postcolonial Critique

From a postcolonial perspective, these narratives function as cinematic imperialism. By framing America as the “benevolent global superpower,” Hollywood silences alternative viewpoints, marginalizing voices of the Global South. As the blog notes, Palki Sharma’s call for Bollywood to mimic Hollywood’s strategy raises concerns: replicating such hegemonic storytelling risks reproducing the very dominance postcolonial critique seeks to challenge. Instead, postcolonial criticism urges film industries like Bollywood to resist these hegemonic patterns by offering alternative stories, questioning global power structures, and amplifying marginalized voices.

Other Examples

Beyond Rambo and Bond, many films perpetuate similar hegemonic ideals by showcasing America as the center of global salvation. Narratives around military heroism, the War on Drugs, or media dominance often repeat the trope of the United States as protector of global order. As the blog suggests, the real cultural power lies not in mimicking such narratives, but in deconstructing them to foster more diverse, inclusive cinematic perspectives.

Conclusion

The Rambo and James Bond franchises illustrate how Hollywood advances American dominance by aligning entertainment with geopolitical interests. These films reinforce the U.S. as a liberator and moral authority while erasing competing perspectives. Postcolonial critique exposes this cinematic empire as a form of cultural hegemony, urging global industries like Bollywood not to replicate such practices but instead to tell stories that resist, question, and diversify the global narrative landscape.

Appropriating Tribal Resistance in RRR: A Postcolonial Reflection

Click here for the Article

Introduction

S.S. Rajamouli’s RRR reimagines the lives of Alluri Sitarama Raju and Komaram Bheem, two tribal leaders historically remembered for their resistance against oppressive regimes. While the film celebrates them as nationalist icons in the struggle against British colonialism, this narrative choice raises critical questions about how popular cinema appropriates and reframes subaltern resistance. By shifting the focus from local struggles over land, water, and forests to a broader anti-colonial epic, RRR simultaneously contributes to nationalist pride and risks undermining postcolonial struggles rooted in environmental and indigenous rights.

From Local Resistance to Nationalist Appropriation

Historically, Raju fought the British following the 1882 Madras Forest Act, which stripped Adivasis of their rights to traditional forest habitats, while Bheem resisted the Nizam of Hyderabad with the slogan “Jal, Jangal, Zameen” (Water, Forest, Land). Their struggles were specific, local, and rooted in protecting indigenous ways of life from displacement and environmental destruction. Rajamouli’s film, however, reframes them as united freedom fighters against the British Raj, aligning their legacies with the nationalist agenda. This cinematic choice transforms tribal resistance into a symbol of India’s anti-colonial unity but glosses over the original environmental and cultural dimensions of their struggles.

Displacement and Its Deeper Meaning

The material stresses that displacement cannot be reduced to physical relocation. As Annie Zaidi notes, it is about losing rivers, grazing land, cattle, honey, herbs, and even the right to protest. This profound sense of loss captures the reality against which Raju and Bheem historically fought. By ignoring this lived reality of indigenous displacement, RRR dilutes the very essence of tribal resistance, presenting it instead as a patriotic battle against imperial rule. Such reframing risks erasing the relevance of their legacies for contemporary struggles against industrialization, deforestation, and corporate exploitation.

Nationalism vs. Environmental Justice

While nationalism provides a powerful cinematic theme, it often overshadows the ongoing displacement of indigenous communities by modern state and corporate interests. In celebrating resistance against the British, RRR avoids addressing how today’s tribal communities continue to face exploitation, land loss, and environmental degradation. This selective framing risks reducing Raju and Bheem to symbols of national pride rather than voices for environmental and social justice. By privileging nationalism over ecology, the film undermines the potential of cinema to engage with pressing postcolonial concerns like climate change and indigenous rights.

Contribution or Undermining of Postcolonial Struggles

Narratives like RRR contribute to postcolonial struggles by reclaiming colonized figures and showcasing them as heroic resistors. Yet, they also undermine these struggles when they flatten complex histories into nationalist spectacles. By overlooking the ongoing fight for jal, jungle, jameen, the film misses an opportunity to link historical resistance to contemporary movements for environmental justice. In doing so, it risks turning subaltern heroes into cultural symbols divorced from the realities of the very people they once defended.

Other Narratives of Resistance

The critique suggests that films dealing with indigenous or subaltern resistance often face a similar dilemma: they can either highlight localized struggles for land, culture, and survival, or reframe them within a larger nationalist or global narrative. When they choose the latter, as RRR does, they run the risk of appropriating and diluting subaltern voices, sidelining the issues of displacement, ecological degradation, and indigenous rights that remain central in postcolonial contexts.

Conclusion

RRR succeeds as a spectacle of unity and defiance against colonial power but represents a missed opportunity to foreground the environmental and social struggles at the heart of Raju’s and Bheem’s legacies. By appropriating their resistance into a nationalist narrative, the film obscures the ongoing challenges of displacement and ecological degradation faced by tribal communities. Postcolonial critique reveals that while such narratives can inspire collective pride, they also risk undermining the transformative potential of indigenous resistance by neglecting its contemporary relevance to environmental justice and subaltern survival.

References

Dilip Barad. “GLOBALIZATION AND THE FUTURE OF POSTCOLONIAL STUDIES.” ResearchGate, Oct. 2022, www.researchgate.net/publication/376374570_GLOBALIZATION_AND_THE_FUTURE_OF_POSTCOLONIAL_STUDIES. Accessed 15 Sept. 2025.

Dilip Barad. “GLOBALIZATION AND FICTION: EXPLORING POSTCOLONIAL CRITIQUE AND LITERARY REPRESENTATIONS.” ResearchGate, Oct. 2022, www.researchgate.net/publication/376371617_GLOBALIZATION_AND_FICTION_EXPLORING_POSTCOLONIAL_CRITIQUE_AND_LITERARY_REPRESENTATIONS. Accessed 15 Sept. 2025.

Barad, Dilip. “(PDF) Postcolonial Studies in the Anthropocene: Bridging Perspectives for a Sustainable Future.” Researchgate, Oct. 2022, www.researchgate.net/publication/373734635_Postcolonial_Studies_in_the_Anthropocene_Bridging_Perspectives_for_a_Sustainable_Future. Accessed 15 Sept. 2025. 

Barad, Dilip. “Heroes or Hegemons? The Celluloid Empire of Rambo and Bond in America’s Geopolitical Narrative.” Researchgate, Aug. 2024, www.researchgate.net/publication/383415195_Heroes_or_Hegemons_The_Celluloid_Empire_of_Rambo_and_Bond_in_America’s_Geopolitical_Narrative. Accessed 15 Sept. 2025. 

Barad, Dilip. “Reimagining Resistance: The Appropriation of Tribal Heroes in Rajamouli’s RRR.” Researchgate, Aug. 2024, www.researchgate.net/publication/383603395_Reimagining_Resistance_The_Appropriation_of_Tribal_Heroes_in_Rajamouli’s_RRR. Accessed 15 Sept. 2025.